Abstract

Practitioners widely acknowledge the importance of including local and Indigenous knowledge in environmental research and decision-making. Nevertheless, it remains a challenge to achieve this integration in a meaningful way. The pilot study reported here was a necessary step toward developing improved methods for communicating local and Indigenous knowledge to decision-makers, with a focus on public sector practitioners as audience and visual content as medium. The proposed methodology extends previous research on climate change adaptation in the Alaskan Arctic, and it examines the effect of a reporting approach that introduces two components outside of general conventions in public sector information dissemination; 1) the application of context-rich images to help convey the social and cultural nuances of place-based information, and 2) multiple evidence base (MEB) reporting which engages information from both Western science and local/Indigenous knowledge systems. Context-rich images  defined here as detailed visuals that address the particularities of specific environments and cultures – are explored given their potential merits in expressing place-based concepts, such as social life and lived experience quickly and concisely when presented in tandem with text. With a focus on practical application, public sector conventions for reporting place-based information to decision-makers are investigated, including the benefits and limitations associated with these conventions. Insights from both theory and practice informed the research methodology, and the design of a sample report and online questionnaire tested with upper-level public sector practitioners who have influence on environmental decision-making. Pilot study results indicated significant benefits of using context-rich images in addition to quotes about lived experience for reporting information about the local context and experience of Northern environmental changes. When presented alongside research from Western science, neither local observations in the form of quotes, nor context-rich images posed negative impacts on the perceived credibility of the report. The pilot study revealed the proposed methodology to be particularly beneficial for a target audience of practitioners who may lack expertise in the local context or field of research being reported. Additionally, several potential improvements to the content and design of research materials were identified for the benefit of future studies.

Highlights

  • Collaboration, negotiation, and decision-making undertaken in the interest of adaptation to climatic and social change bring together diverse stakeholders from a range of disciplines and cultural backgrounds

  • We describe and report the following; (1) how the pilot study is framed through the lens of sustainability science and knowledge gaps impacting the management of complex social-environmental systems, (2) a summary of key concepts in visual theory that makes the case for contextrich images as tools to help overcome information biases plaguing transdisciplinary governance efforts, (3) the Images as Information Pilot Study setting and methodology as an offshoot of the parent, Wainwright) Study, and informed by key informant interviews, which collectively shaped materials and procedures, (4) pilot study results; and (5) practical recommendations for reporting techniques in public sector environmental management, and for future studies attempting to understand the potential of Multiple Evidence Base (MEB) and visual reporting approaches

  • Where Kress and Van Leeuwen (1996) posited that scientifically trained audiences are likely to ascribe greater truth to abstracted images of generalizable scientific information, our findings reveal that the same audience may find context-rich images to be trustworthy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Collaboration, negotiation, and decision-making undertaken in the interest of adaptation to climatic and social change bring together diverse stakeholders from a range of disciplines and cultural backgrounds. We describe and report the following; (1) how the pilot study is framed through the lens of sustainability science and knowledge gaps impacting the management of complex social-environmental systems, (2) a summary of key concepts in visual theory that makes the case for contextrich images as tools to help overcome information biases plaguing transdisciplinary governance efforts, (3) the Images as Information Pilot Study setting and methodology as an offshoot of the parent, Wainwright) Study, and informed by key informant interviews, which collectively shaped materials and procedures, (4) pilot study results; and (5) practical recommendations for reporting techniques in public sector environmental management, and for future studies attempting to understand the potential of MEB and visual reporting approaches. How would you rate your familiarity with environmental issues on the North Slope of Alaska? Scale: 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very) How would you rate your familiarity with social issues on the North Slope of Alaska? Scale: 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very) How would you rate your level of experience working with Indigenous peoples in Alaska? Scale: 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very) Local and/or Indigenous knowledge are among the information sources I use in environmental planning Scale: True/ False/ Not-applicable Local and/or Indigenous knowledge are among the information sources I use in environmental decision-making Scale: True/ False/ Not-applicable How valuable do you think local and/or Indigenous knowledge are as sources of information for environmental planning/decision-making? Scale: 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very), Given your rating of the value of local and/or Indigenous knowledge, how much attention do you believe it receives in environmental planning/decision-making? Scale: (1) Not enough, (2) Just enough, (3) Too much The number that best describes your learning preference is: Scale: On a scale from 1 (Highly textual) to 5 (Highly visual)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.