Abstract
State-of-the-art research in image quality assessment has been oriented toward objective measures of image quality, requiring microdensitometers and computers. Cost and time constraints in the operational situation, however, place emphasis on man-dependent methods. This paper describes the performance of the image interpreter in a study comparing two of the more widely accepted Air Force subjective measures of image quality: tribar target resolution reading and visual edge matching. These techniques are described, interpreter certification is discussed, data derived from the application of each technique to a common imagery set are presented, and a comparison of the two methods reported.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
