Abstract

Almost all image sensors measure only one color per pixel through the color filter array. Missing pixels are estimated using a demosaicing process. For this reason, a demosaiced image leaves a particular trace. When an image is manipulated or tampered, the demosaicing trace can be changed. This change can serve as a basic clue for detecting or localizing image tampering. Demosaicing pattern-based tampering localization algorithms require a re-interpolation process, and the prediction residue between the given image and the re-interpolated image is commonly used to localize tampered regions. However, the prediction residue is not always valid because the demosaicing interpolation kernel cannot be known, which deteriorates the localization performance. This paper presents an effective re-interpolation process using singular value decomposition for an unknown demosaicing method. First, the green channel of the given image is decomposed into four sub-images according to the Bayer pattern. For a small block of each sub-image, the singular value decomposition is performed. The prediction residue is obtained by reconstructing the image block after removing the largest singular value. The feature to localize the forged regions is extracted by the logarithm ratio of the prediction residue variance. The proposed method does not require any statistical model for the extracted feature, because the prediction residue is more accurate than that of conventional methods. We perform intensive experiments for three test datasets and compare the proposed method with state-of-the-art tampering localization methods, the results of which indicate that the proposed scheme outperforms existing approaches.

Highlights

  • Images are often used as evidence to determine the authenticity of an event

  • To verify the effectiveness of the proposed tampering localization method, we tested it on three datasets, including the Columbia uncompressed image splicing detection evaluation dataset (CUISDE) [46], image manipulation dataset (IMD) [47], and realistic tampering dataset (RTD) [48]

  • IMD is comprised of 160 images, whereas RTD presents 220 images for image forgery detection

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Images are often used as evidence to determine the authenticity of an event. The use of manipulated images for malicious purposes can demonstrate a negative impact on human society. Because detecting forged images by human eye is difficult, the development of a reliable image tampering detection method is required to determine image authenticity. A commonly used tampering method is image splicing. Choosing which characteristics appear differently by image tampering is vital. Identifying the different statistical characteristics of the parts of a tampered image is the basis for detecting or localizing image splicing. Splicing detection [5,6,7,8,9,10] can determine whether a given image is authentic or tampered. In practical forensic applications, localizing splicing regions [11,12,13] compared with splicing detection is more effective

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call