Image quality evaluation of a new high-performance ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography imager

Abstract

Objective. Newer cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging systems offer reconstruction algorithms including metal artifact reduction (MAR) and extended field-of-view (eFoV) techniques to improve image quality. In this study a new CBCT imager, the new Varian HyperSight CBCT, is compared to fan-beam CT and two CBCT imagers installed in a ring-gantry and C-arm linear accelerator, respectively. Approach. The image quality was assessed for HyperSight CBCT which uses new hardware, including a large-size flat panel detector, and improved image reconstruction algorithms. The decrease of metal artifacts was quantified (structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and root-mean-squared error (RMSE)) when applying MAR reconstruction and iterative reconstruction for a dental and spine region using a head-and-neck phantom. The geometry and CT number accuracy of the eFoV reconstruction was evaluated outside the standard field-of-view (sFoV) on a large 3D-printed chest phantom. Phantom size dependency of CT numbers was evaluated on three cylindrical phantoms of increasing diameter. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise were quantified on an abdominal phantom. Main results. In phantoms with streak artifacts, MAR showed comparable results for HyperSight CBCT and CT, with MAR increasing the SSIM (0.97–0.99) and decreasing the RMSE (62–55 HU) compared to iterative reconstruction without MAR. In addition, HyperSight CBCT showed better geometrical accuracy in the eFoV than CT (Jaccard Conformity Index increase of 0.02–0.03). However, the CT number accuracy outside the sFoV was lower than for CT. The maximum CT number variation between different phantom sizes was lower for the HyperSight CBCT imager (∼100 HU) compared to the two other CBCT imagers (∼200 HU), but not fully comparable to CT (∼50 HU). Significance. This study demonstrated the imaging performance of the new HyperSight CBCT imager and the potential of applying this CBCT system in more advanced scenarios by comparing the quality against fan-beam CT.