Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and image quality of a low-dose triple-rule-out (TRO) computed tomography (CT) angiogram on a second-generation dual-source CT scanner using a high-pitch helical acquisition. Ten men (mean age 56.3 y, average body mass index 24.2) underwent TRO CT angiography using a high-pitch helical acquisition. Patients were imaged from the lung bases to the thoracic inlet in a caudocranial direction. A biphasic injection was administered at 6 mL/s. Study parameters including kVp, mAs, CT dose index volume, dose-length product, and effective dose were calculated. Image quality was independently assessed by 2 cardiothoracic radiologists using the following scale: 1-nondiagnostic; 2-moderately limited diagnostic ability; 3-mild limitation but diagnostic; 4-ideal. For each patient up to 23 structures were evaluated: 17 coronary segments, 3 pulmonary artery levels, 2 aortic sections, and the lung parenchyma. The unpaired t test and the Fisher exact test were used for comparison between patients scored at 80 and 100 kV. The average CT dose index volume, dose-length product, and effective dose for the TRO scans was 2.65, 81.9, and 1.39 mSv, respectively. Readers 1 and 2 scored 171/203 (83%) and 173/203 (84%) of the evaluated regions as ideal and 26/203 (12.8%) and 24/203 (11.8%) as being mildly limited, respectively. Each reader graded 6/203 (3.9%) as being moderately limited. No areas were nondiagnostic. Patients scanned at 80 kV had a significantly higher number of limited segments for readers 1 (P=0.0012) and 2 (P=0.0027). Low-dose, high-image quality TRO scans can be effectively performed using a high-pitch helical acquisition.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.