Abstract

The location, tissue background and imaging characteristics of true positive and false negative screens of breast cancers have been studied. These data can aid decisions in optimising the display of mammographic information, with the objective of minimizing false negative screens. Screening mammograms for four groups of women were digitised: those with screen detected cancers, those with false negative interval cancers, and matched normals for both groups. The optical density (OD) distribution in the main breast region of each mammogram was determined. The OD in three regions of interest around the cancers were also measured: corresponding to the cancer centre, its outline, and a ring of background tissue. Cancer locations were mapped and warped onto a typical image. Where a cancer was detected by calcifications alone it had a relatively low probability of being a false negative interval cancer. The mean OD differences between the cancer and the cancer background region were approximately a factor of two lower in dense breasts rather than in other breast types. Poorly defined masses that became interval cancers had mean OD differences that were approximately of 0.1 OD lower than those that were detectable by screening. Of the false negative cancers 22% were located near the chest wall edge of the mammograms, compared to 10% of the true positives. The results indicate the importance of effectively displaying information in the lighter areas of the mammogram, corresponding to glandular tissues. Where the cancer mean OD differences are low, as measured for some poorly defined masses, there is an increased risk of a false negative interval cancer. Particular attention should be given to the chest wall area of the film, especially in the lower retroglandular region, during routine screening.

Highlights

  • Histological analysis of core biopsy of breast lesions takes a minimum of 24 h, but imprint cytology of a core biopsy can be reported within an hour

  • A total of 450,425 women were screened by BreastScreen Western Australia (BSWA) from January 1990 to December 2000. 2,314 cancers were detected with a total cancer detection rate of 5.1 cancers per 1,000 women screened. 4,916 women of ATSI origin were screened during this interval. 31 breast cancers were diagnosed, with a total cancer detection rate of 6.3 cancers per 1,000 women screened

  • These lesions may mimic the microcalcifications of ductal carcinoma in situ at screening mammography

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Histological analysis of core biopsy of breast lesions takes a minimum of 24 h, but imprint cytology of a core biopsy can be reported within an hour. This study validates the accuracy of imprint cytology from core biopsy of breast lesions obtained under ultrasound control. Full field digital mammography (FFDM) seems set to replace conventional film-screen technique. Concern has been raised over FFDM diminished spatial resolution (5–6 Ip/mm). If valid, this could compromise detection of calcification and diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In our centre we were not able to perceive any difference between microfocus magnification and on-screen magnification when assessing microcalcification. We subsequently compared these results with average scores for over 90 film-screen mammography systems

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.