Abstract

Image feature correspondence selection is pivotal to many computer vision tasks from object recognition to 3D reconstruction. Although many correspondence selection algorithms have been developed in the past decade, there still lacks an in-depth evaluation and comparison in the open literature, which makes it difficult to choose the appropriate algorithm for a specific application. This paper attempts to fill this gap by evaluating eight competing correspondence selection algorithms including both classical methods and current state-of-the-art ones. In addition to preselected correspondences, we have compared different combinations of detector and descriptor on four standard datasets. The diversity of those datasets cover a wide range of uncertainty factors including zoom, rotation, blur, viewpoint change, JPEG compression, light change, different rendering styles and multiple structures. We have measured the quality of competing correspondence selection algorithms in terms of four performance metrics -i.e., precision, recall, F-measure and efficiency. Moreover, we propose to combine the strengths of eight competing methods by combining their correspondence selection results. Extensive experimental results are reported to demonstrate the superiority of several fusion strategies to individual methods, which suggests the possibility of adaptively combining those methods for even better performance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call