Abstract
The preoccupation of many public relations practitioners with the concept of image suggests that public relations is concerned only with symbolism—with what the organization says about itself. A paradigm struggle is occurring in public relations, therefore, between practitioners who use only superficial symbolic activities—the quest for positive images—and those who build substantive behavioral relationships between organizations and publics. Communication of symbols alone does not make an organization more effective. Nevertheless, symbolic and behavioral relationships are “intertwined like the strands of a rope.” This article deconstructs the meaning of image as it is used in several fields of communication and psychology. It suggests that “image” disguises the more precise concepts of perception, cognition, attitude, and schema—concepts that identify symbolic objectives for public relations. Over the long term, however, organizations must evaluate the contribution of these objectives to the behavioral relationships with publics if they are to help organizations achieve their goals and missions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.