Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to examine the efficacy of the concomitant use of infrapopliteal drug-eluting balloon angioplasty and a medical treatment (iloprost) in the treatment of critical leg ischemia. Methods Eighty-seven patients that underwent infrapopliteal drug-eluting balloon angioplasty for critical leg ischemia were included in this retrospective study. For analyses, patients were allocated into one of the two groups: 55 patients that underwent drug-eluting balloon angioplasty alone (drug-eluting balloon Group), and 32 patients that received intravenous iloprost for one week after drug-eluting balloon (DEB-I Group). Demographic, perioperative and follow-up clinical data were extracted retrospectively and analyzed. Results Duration of hospitalization was significantly longer in the DEB-I group (9.7 vs. 3.1 days, p < 0.001); however, the two groups were similar in terms of other clinical outcomes including early postoperative mortality, and primary patency, wound healing, reintervention, mortality, and amputation rates at one year ( p > 0.05 for all). Primary patency was similar across groups. Wound healing occurred earlier in the DEB-I group when compared to drug-eluting balloon group, in the subgroup of patients with ischemic wound at baseline. Mean time to wound healing was 3.0 ± 0.6 and 4.4 ± 0.6 months in DEB-I and drug-eluting balloon groups, respectively ( p = 0.037). Conclusions Iloprost add-on treatment in patients undergoing drug-eluting balloon angioplasty for critical limb ischemia seems to have additional benefits, at least in terms of accelerated wound healing. Further large prospective studies are warranted.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call