Abstract

Our starting place is the first order seasonal autoregressive model. Its series are shown to have canonical model-based decompositions whose finite-sample estimates, filters, and error covariances have simple revealing formulas from basic linear regression. We obtain analogous formulas for seasonal random walks, extending some of the results of Maravall and Pierce (J Time Series Anal, 8:177–293, 1987). The seasonal decomposition filters of the biannual seasonal random walk have formulas that explicitly reveal which deterministic functions they annihilate and which they reproduce, directly illustrating very general results of Bell (J Off Stat, 28:441–461, 2012; Center for Statistical Research and Methodology, Research Report Series, Statistics #2015-03, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. https://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/RRS2015-03, 2015). Other formulas express phenomena heretofore lacking such concrete expression, such as the much discussed negative autocorrelation at the first seasonal lag quite often observed in differenced seasonally adjusted series. An innovation that is also applied to airline model seasonal decompositions is the effective use of signs of lag one and first-seasonal-lag autocorrelations (after differencing) to indicate, in a formal way, where smoothness is increased by seasonal adjustment and where its effect is opposite.

Highlights

  • With uncorrelated at, whose variance Eat2 is denoted σa2

  • The calendar month. smoothing indicated in Table 4 is reinforced, moderately to strongly at 2 years remove involves first seasonal lag autocorrelations

  • The factored formulas for the seasonal random walk display the full range of differencing operators of ARIMA model-based seasonal decomposition filters identified in Bell (2012, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Overview

7.2, we obtain the forecast and backcast results which are required to derive the asymmetric filters for initial and final years of a finite sample as well as the error variances of their estimates These illustrate in a simple way the fundamental role of Bell’s Assumption A. Graphs display the quite different visual smoothing effects of filters from such on the monthly International Airline Passenger totals series for which the model is named In a formal way based on autocorrelations of the component estimates of the different types of models considered (fully differenced in the nonstationary case), it shows where smoothness is enhanced, and where an opposite result occurs, among the seasonal decomposition components. More useful for readers than their derivations or details will be to study how the formulas are used

Some conventions and terminology
The general stationary setting
Autocovariance and spectral density decompositions
Regression formulas for two-component decompositions
The estimated decomposition
Variance and error variance matrix formulas
The general filter formulas
Filter re-expressions and filter terminology
Filter transfer functions and the input–output spectral density formula
The W–K formulas
Going nonstationary with the seasonal random walk
ARIMA component filters from pseudo-spectral density decompositions
Bell’s assumptions
Assumption A yields MMSE forecasts and backcasts
The estimates’ symmetric filters and ARIMA models
The estimates’ asymmetric filter formulas
Symmetric and concurrent SWP filter coefficient features
11 Reciprocal smoothing properties of seasonal and trend estimates
12 Airline model results: the role of
13.5 Airline model component estimates: autocorrelations after full differencing
13.5.3 Seasonal autocorrelations and calendar month smoothness
13.5.4 Lag 1 autocorrelation and monthly smoothness results
14 Concluding remarks
15 Appendix 1
16 Appendix 2
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call