Abstract
This chapter discusses the nature of legitimate knowledge in English language education research, arguing that what counts as knowledge in the field is a hugely contested matter. Our search for legitimate knowledge through objective and scientific means in research is far from being objective and disinterested. The problem is not simply the use of methods in research, but what methods count and do not count which, in turn, have implications for (de)legitimizing knowledge and evidence. The commoditization of knowledge in competitive markets outside the academe demands that the research predispositions of scholars and students be (re)aligned with a scientific habitus – disciplined, rigorous, and methodical – in order for them to be credible and for their research to be marketable. Therefore, the aim of this chapter is to trace a specific trajectory of the delegitimization of knowledge in (English) language education research, and then call for the greater democratization of knowledge production in the field, for example by recognizing that scholars and writers operate on radically different understandings of what methodology is.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.