Abstract

Associative plasticity theories do not predict correctly the volumetric plastic strain, in the course of plastic deformation, in the case of materials where the position and conformation of the yield surface are functions of the prevailing hydrostatic stress. Non-associative theories have been proposed and used to correct this deficiency. Such theories, however, lead to other serious difficulties. In this paper we establish clear criteria for the well-posedness of the initial, boundary/initial and boundary value problems when the plasticity theory is associative as well as non-associative. We further show cases where non-associativity leads to ill-posedness of these problems even when the material is not at failure. Specifically we demonstrate that the initial/boundary and boundary value problems either have no solution, or if they do, the solution is not unique. We also show by specific examples that the banding condition, i.e., the vanishing of the determinant of the acoustic tensor, is tantamount (a) to loss of hyperbolicity of the equation of motion and (b) lack of existence or loss of uniqueness of the solution of the boundary value problem, in certain situations. Finally, we show the existence of a fundamental criterion that governs the stability of infinitesimal as well as finite elastoplastic domains.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.