Ileal Neobladder and Its Variants

Abstract

Orthotopic neobladder substitution represents an important step in the evolution of urinary diversion. It is now considered the diversion of choice for the majority of patients, both male and female, who undergo cystectomy and is the procedure with which other types of diversion must be compared. Nevertheless, in the preoperative setting, all options for urinary diversion should be explained comprehensibly to the patient, along with the potential short- and long-term risks and the beneficial effects of each type of diversion. With regard to the risk of urethral recurrence, the decision to perform a neobladder ultimately depends on the intraoperative frozen section analysis of the distal urethral margin. Neobladder construction is based on the concept of detubularization and folding to construct a low-pressure reservoir. All parts of the small and large intestine as well as the stomach have been intensely studied for the construction of neobladders. In this respect, there is substantial agreement in the literature that the terminal ileum possesses superior anatomic and functional characteristics. Given the lack of prospective randomized trials, controversies still exist with regard to the technique for preventing reflux in orthotopic substitutes and the superiority of one neobladder technique over others, provided the detubularized intestinal segment is reconfigured to an adequate-sized spherical reservoir.