Abstract

BackgroundSubstance use disorders show a high comorbidity with externalizing behavior difficulties, creating treatment challenges, including difficulties with compliance, a high risk of conflict, and a high rate of offending post-treatment. Compared with people with other substance use disorders those with opioid use disorders have the highest risk of criminal activity, but studies on the evidence base for psychosocial treatment in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) are scarce. The Impulsive Lifestyle Counselling (ILC) program may be associated with better retention and outcomes among difficult-to-treat patients with this comorbidity.MethodsThe study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, superiority clinical trial. Participants will be a total of 137 hard-to-treat individuals enrolled in opioid agonist treatment (OAT). Participants will be randomized to either a standard treatment (14 sessions of individual manual-based cognitive behavioral therapy and motivational interviewing (MOVE-I)) or six sessions of ILC followed by nine sessions of MOVE-I. All participants will receive personalized text reminders prior to each session and vouchers for attendance, as well as medication as needed. The primary outcome is retention in treatment. Secondary measures include severity of drug use and days of criminal offending for profit three and nine months post-randomization. A secondary aim is, through a case-control study, to investigate whether participants in the trial differ from patients receiving treatment as usual in municipalities where ILC and MOVE-I have not been implemented in OAT. This will be done by comparing number of offences leading to conviction 12 months post-randomization recorded in the national criminal justice register and number of emergency room contacts 12 months post-randomization recorded in the national hospital register.DiscussionThis is the first randomized, controlled clinical trial in OAT to test the effectiveness of ILC against a standardized comparison with structural elements to increase the likelihood of exposure to the elements of treatment. Results obtained from this study may have important clinical, social, and economic implications for publicly funded treatment of opioid use disorder.Trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN19554367, registered on 04/09/2020.

Highlights

  • IntroductionGoals, and four areas of an impulsive lifestyle (self-indulgence, breaking rules, interpersonal intrusiveness, and irresponsibility). 4

  • Dreams, goals, and four areas of an impulsive lifestyle. 4

  • Hesse et al BMC Psychiatry (2021) 21:183 (Continued from previous page). This is the first randomized, controlled clinical trial in opioid agonist treatment (OAT) to test the effectiveness of Impulsive Lifestyle Counselling (ILC) against a standardized comparison with structural elements to increase the likelihood of exposure to the elements of treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Goals, and four areas of an impulsive lifestyle (self-indulgence, breaking rules, interpersonal intrusiveness, and irresponsibility). 4. Patients will be excluded if they have a severe mental disorder (e.g. current psychosis), cognitive difficulties, or severe aggressive and chaotic behavior that would preclude their participation in the counselling sessions. Substance use disorders show a high comorbidity with externalizing behavior difficulties, creating treatment challenges, including difficulties with compliance, a high risk of conflict, and a high rate of offending post-treatment. Under the P-model of psychopathology, externalizing and internalizing spectrum disorders constitute dimensions of psychopathology in disorders associated with behavioral difficulties and emotional difficulties, respectively [1, 2]. Latent class models indicate that classes characterized by high levels of externalizing difficulties have the highest degree of comorbidity with substance use disorders in the general population [1], as well as in other groups such as prison inmates [3]. We are not aware of strong evidence that distress by itself is associated with poor outcomes in treatment for substance use disorders

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call