Abstract

Within anthropology, data collection is not a standardized process. Therefore, documentation praxis on the field is deeply subjective. The very conceptual definition of “fieldnotes” is highly variable among researchers and their construction, content, the extent of the subsequent re-writing process, objectives do not meet univocal or universal criteria. However, taking notes is essential for the gaining of ethnographic knowledge. In this article, I focus on some potentially problematic methodological aspects of the writing of fieldnotes. Social actors might find the note-taking disturbing and suspicious and they might react to it with hostility or apprehension. Under certain circumstances or in certain settings it may be inappropriate to take notes. It is necessary to continuously adapt the need to jot with both the contingent situations and the behavior of the bystanders. Here, as an example I describe the background and its adaptations to the context of the methodology for writing fieldnotes that I applied during research I conducted in a hospital ward. I also illustrate my re-writing of fieldnotes procedures during and after the fieldwork.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.