Ignorance of pre-ED healthcare setting is a factor leading to inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment of sepsis in ED and poor outcomes in ICU.

Abstract

Appropriate initial antibiotic therapy is critical for successfully treating sepsis. In the emergency department (ED), clinicians often rely on septic symptoms to guide empirical therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether history of contacting pre-ED healthcare setting is easy to be neglected and whether the patients received more inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy and developed poorer outcomes. Septic patients (n=453) admitted from ED to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2014 and 2017 were retrospectively selected. Appropriate antibiotic treatment or not was determined by checking whether the selected antibiotics can effectively eradicate the bacteria identified. Various indexes were compared between patients with appropriate and inappropriate initial antibiotic treatments, including septic symptoms (qSOFA scores) in ED, septic-severity change in ICU (SOFA-score ratios), and septic outcomes (APACHE II scores, stay length, 30-day survival probability). These indexes were also compared between pre-ED healthcare and pre-ED community patients. In comparison with pre-ED community patients, pre-ED healthcare patients received more inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment in ED, showing poorer outcomes in ICU, including septic severity, stay-lengths in ICU and 30-day survival probabilities. Pre-ED settings is more significant than qSOFA scores to predict the inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment. Pre-ED healthcare settings, which are indexes for infection with antibiotic resistant pathogens, are easy to be neglected in the first hour in ED. We suggested that standard operating procedure for getting enough information of pre-ED settings should be incorporated to the 1h bundle of sepsis guideline.