IGA nephropathy – Are intravenous steroid pulses more effective than oral steroids in relapse prevention?

Abstract

IntroductionIt is recommended that IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is treated with steroids when the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is >50ml/min and proteinuria >1g/day. Few studies have been performed comparing the two accepted steroid regimens (1g/day methylprednisolone pulses for 3 consecutive days at the beginning of months 1, 3 and 5, followed by 0.5mg/kg prednisolone on alternate days vs. 1mg/kg/day oral prednisolone). The aim of this study was to compare these two steroid regimens in IgAN treatment. MethodsWe selected 39 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN treated with steroids. Mean age at diagnosis was 37.5 years, 23 males (59%), baseline proteinuria (Uprot) was 2.1 g/day and median serum creatinine (SCr) was 1.5mg/dl. The mean follow-up period was 56 months. Twenty-five patients (64%) were treated with methylprednisolone pulses and 14 (36%) with oral steroids. ResultsPatients treated with steroid pulses presented lower relapse risk, defined as the reappearance of Uprot >1g/day and an Uprot increase of more than 50% (incidence rate ratio of 0.18, 95% CI 0.02–0.5). The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed longer relapse-free period (p=0.019). This result was confirmed in a multivariate analysis (p=0.026). However, we did not find other differences between the two steroid regimens. ConclusionsIn comparison to oral steroids, the intravenous pulse regimen was associated with a lower risk of relapse in IgAN, a known independent negative predictor of renal survival. No differences were found regarding the other renal outcomes.