Abstract
ABSTRACTOrthorexia nervosa (ON) describes a pathological obsession with healthy eating to avoid ill health. In the Swedish context, ON is also understood in terms of unhealthy exercise. Fitness gyms are popular health-promoting places, but exercise-related problems, disordered eating and ON-like behaviour are increasing. Personal trainers (PTs) play an important role in detecting unhealthy behaviours. The aim of the present study was to illuminate PTs’ understandings of healthy and unhealthy exercise and eating behaviours in relation to orthorexia nervosa in a fitness gym context. Five focus groups with 14 PTs were conducted. These were analysed using interpretative qualitative content analysis and Becker’s model “Kinds of Deviance.” In contrast to PTs’ health norms (practicing balanced behaviours and contributing to well-being), ON was expressed mainly in terms of exercise behaviour and as being excessive and in total control. The PTs maintain that extreme behaviours are legitimized by an aggressive exercise trend in society and that they fear to falsely accuse clients of being pathological. Certain sport contexts (bodybuilding, fitness competitions and elite sports) and specific groups (fitness professionals) contribute to complicating PTs’ negotiations due to a competition, performance and/or profession norm, making it difficult to determine whether or not to intervene.
Highlights
Since the 1970s a greater individual responsibility for achieving health has been emphasized, framing it as a moral obligation—the ideology of “healthism” (Crawford, 1980; Lupton, 1995)
Excessive exercise refers to high frequency, duration and intensity, whereas excessive eating behaviours refer to ingesting food on a strict
This study has demonstrated that, in contrast to Personal trainers (PTs) health norms, Orthorexia nervosa (ON) was regarded as pure deviant and conceptualized in terms of being excessive and in total control regarding eating and exercise behaviours
Summary
Since the 1970s a greater individual responsibility for achieving health has been emphasized, framing it as a moral obligation—the ideology of “healthism” (Crawford, 1980; Lupton, 1995). According to this ideology, health is considered to be a goal in itself, not a means for attaining other goals in life (cf WHO, 1986). The view of health in this study is based on a practical definition that includes subjective experiences of health that is contextual, : “Health is the experience of physical and psychological well-being” This health definition states that health occurs on a continuum and that absence of disease is not necessary for a feeling of good health (Card, 2017)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
