Abstract
THE House of Lords in Royal Bank of Scotland plc v. Etridge (No. 2) [2001] UKHL 44, [2001] 3 W.L.R. 1021 refined and reformulated the principles laid down in Barclays Bank plc v. O’Brien [1994] 1 A.C. 180. Among other things, Etridge sets out new minimum requirements for mortgagees who take third party security from wives or partners and for solicitors whose task it is in such cases to advise the surety.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
