Abstract
En teoretisk diskussion af autonomibegrebet. This article discusses the boundaries between sports governance and government policy in the Danish welfare state and sheds new light on the concept of autonomy. The formerly liberal Danish government’s public health programme (2002-2010) specifies a wish for social involvement and cooperation between the public and the voluntary sector. Governmental conception is that health political subjects and social issues are a challenge which the community solidarity-based non-governmental sports association should take the responsibility for, e.g. by offering comprehensive options for people with no tradition for physical activity. This paper will in a sociological way, with the use of an Eliasian process analytical perspective and a governmentality perspective (Elias 1970, Dean 2006), discuss the enabling and constraining possibilities of the political relations. Themes like the autonomy of sports organisations/ associations will be included in order to discuss the possible significance in the future of a partnership between the public and the voluntary sector. Should sport contribute some specific welfare ideological values or should it simply unfold a more general health promotion pedagogic effort? In line with Eliasian thinking it will be highligh ted that sport always has been part of, and always could be seen as a (body) political scenario. There is a changing relation between autonomy versus heteronomy of stakeholders in sports governance, but what is the new thing in the unfolded political involvement? By doing an analytical empirical investigation, the paper focuses upon the fact that the concept of shared responsibility and interdependence between sport and society has a long historical tradition – in Denmark.
Highlights
LONE FRIIS THING OG LAILA OTTESEN vold i gaderne er en samfundsmæssig udfor- ulighed
Terlyser organisationernes medansvar for det Regeringen skitserer i forhold til partnerskasamfundsmæssige liv, især set i forhold til så- berne med civilsamfundets organisationer samkaldte ‘svage og udsatte’ borgere, der åbenlyst arbejdets mulige temaområder, men definerer ikke er inkluderede i allerede etablerede kol- eller problematiserer ikke yderligere, hvad der lektiver
I starten af denne periode er det kun skytde vil vi vende problematikken på hovedet ved tebevægelsen, der tildeles økonomisk støtte af at spørge: Har idræt, her defineret som den frivil- staten, senere inkluderes gymnastikken, mens lige organisering af den danske idrætskultur – både sporten først i slutningen af perioden findes sport, motion og gymnastik – nogensinde været støtteværdig
Summary
Iden liberale danske regerings folkesundheds- som en reaktion mod den (skandinaviske) soprogram Sund hele livet (2002-10) præciseres et cialdemokratiske velfærdsstat, hvor initiativet ønske om partnerskab og samarbejde mellem og ansvaret for sundhed og sygdom er placeret i det offentlige og den frivillige civile sektor. I stedet ønsker den liberale regering en dring, som fællesskaberne i de ‘non-governmen- arbejdsdeling, der har sine rødder i den liberale tale’ idrætsorganisationer og idrætsforeninger i idé, der bygger på tanken om den frie borger, det civile samfund må tage et medansvar for. Regeringen lægger hermed op til, at menes med ‘partnerskab’ mellem det offentlige velfærdsarbejdet skal reorganiseres, og at orga- og de frivillige organisationer. Idrætsorganisationer og de lokale danske frivil- me og manglende fysisk aktivitet er et bredere lige idrætsforeninger skal, ved at skabe alsidige samfundsmæssigt problem, der vedrører hele og mangfoldige tilbud, motivere borgerne yder- populationen, og som de frivillige organisatioligere til motion og fysisk aktivitet, end de i for- ner derfor må tage medansvar for Den tisk for dermed at få kastet lys på autonomibegre-
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
