Abstract

Peripersonal space is a multisensory representation of the environment around the body in relation to the motor system, underlying the interactions with the physical and social world. Although changing body properties and social context have been shown to alter the functional processing of space, little is known about how changing the value of objects influences the representation of peripersonal space. In two experiments, we tested the effect of modifying the spatial distribution of reward-yielding targets on manual reaching actions and peripersonal space representation. Before and after performing a target-selection task consisting of manually selecting a set of targets on a touch-screen table, participants performed a two-alternative forced-choice reachability-judgment task. In the target-selection task, half of the targets were associated with a reward (change of colour from grey to green, providing 1 point), the other half being associated with no reward (change of colour from grey to red, providing no point). In Experiment 1, the target-selection task was performed individually with the aim of maximizing the point count, and the distribution of the reward-yielding targets was either 50%, 25% or 75% in the proximal and distal spaces. In Experiment 2, the target-selection task was performed in a social context involving cooperation between two participants to maximize the point count, and the distribution of the reward-yielding targets was 50% in the proximal and distal spaces. Results showed that changing the distribution of the reward-yielding targets or introducing the social context modified concurrently the amplitude of self-generated manual reaching actions and the representation of peripersonal space. Moreover, a decrease of the amplitude of manual reaching actions caused a reduction of peripersonal space when resulting from the distribution of reward-yielding targets, while this effect was not observed in a social interaction context. In that case, the decreased amplitude of manual reaching actions was accompanied by an increase of peripersonal space representation, which was not due to the mere presence of a confederate (control experiment). We conclude that reward-dependent modulation of objects values in the environment modifies the representation of peripersonal space, when resulting from either self-generated motor actions or observation of motor actions performed by a confederate.

Highlights

  • To ensure appropriate and safe interactions with our physical and social environment, at every moment our brain needs to isolate from the flow of sensory information the stimuli that are of interest with respect to the current situation

  • The brain retains a segmented representation of the external world, dissociating the peripersonal and extrapersonal spaces [3,4,5,6], depending on whether objects are or are not relevant for impending motor actions

  • As a result of this functional neural organisation, significantly faster visual processing, as indexed by a consistent N1 visual component with faster latencies and greater amplitudes in the visual electroencephalography (EEG) signals, as well as enhanced parietal activity was observed for objects located in near space compared to far space. This was interpreted as an attentional “prior-entry” effect [15] accelerating the processing of objects that appear within reachable space in order to facilitate a rapid interaction with them [16]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To ensure appropriate and safe interactions with our physical and social environment, at every moment our brain needs to isolate from the flow of sensory information the stimuli that are of interest with respect to the current situation. As a result of this functional neural organisation, significantly faster visual processing, as indexed by a consistent N1 visual component with faster latencies and greater amplitudes in the visual electroencephalography (EEG) signals, as well as enhanced parietal activity was observed for objects located in near space compared to far space. This was interpreted as an attentional “prior-entry” effect [15] accelerating the processing of objects that appear within reachable space in order to facilitate a rapid interaction with them [16]. Neuropsychology cases revealed attentional deficits resulting from brain damage in the parieto-temporal regions that were predominantly observed in either the near space [17,18] or far space [19,20]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call