Abstract
Using four different asset pricing models to estimate the residual returns, I show empirically that there are no material differences in the statistical and economic significance between idiosyncratic momentum strategies based on different asset-pricing models. I also show that idiosyncratic momentum is priced in the cross-section of returns, but spanned by a combination of risk factors when the combination includes price momentum. Despite being explained by common risk factors, the results suggest that idiosyncratic momentum is a stronger factor than price momentum and has a lower exposure to earnings momentum than price momentum.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
