Abstract

This article discusses two late nineteenth-century English translations (1889 and 1890) of ‘Le Journal de Marie Bashkirtseff’ (1887). It maintains that the two translations are an important part of the reception history of the Journal because they offer opposing representations of Bashkirtseff’s femininity. The representation of gender in translation is necessarily shaped by the identity of the translator, and in the case of Bashkirtseff’s ‘Journal’, the translator’s ideology and potential identification with the foreign text construct a unique representation of ‘feminine’ in the translation. The paper builds its argument through an investigation of the history of the ‘Journal’ (including its many translations), an exploration of the biographies of its two nineteenth-century translators (Mathilde Blind and Mary Serrano), and a detailed reading of both English translations against the French. Finally, the results of this historical inquiry are used to extend contemporary discussion about gender in translation theory by demonstrating that Mathilde Blind’s work raises questions still being debated by contemporary translation theorists.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.