Ideologies and Attitudes, Academic and Judicial

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessIdeologies and Attitudes, Academic and JudicialGlendon SchubertGlendon Schubert Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 29, Number 1Feb., 1967 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2127810 Views: 14Total views on this site Citations: 36Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1967 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Wenzhang Zhou, Yi Peng, Haijun Bao Regular pattern of judicial decision on land acquisition and resettlement: An investigation on Zhejiang’s 901 administrative litigation cases, Habitat International 63 (May 2017): 79–88.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.013Glendon Schubert Two Versions of Pastoral, from A to Z, Politics and the Life Sciences 1, no.22 (May 2016): 114–124.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0730938400008546C. Neal Tate The methodology of judicial behavior research: A review and critique, Political Behavior 5, no.11 (Jan 1983): 51–82.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989986Charles J. Lumsden, Edward O. Wilson Précis of Genes, Mind, and Culture, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010128David P. Barash From genes to mind to culture: Biting the bullet at last, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 7–8.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0001013XArthur L. Caplan Stalking the wild culturgen, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 8–9.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010141William R. Charlesworth The epigenetic connection between genes and culture: Environment to the rescue, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 9–10.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010153Robert Fagen Epigenesis and culture, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 10–10.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010165Michael T. Ghiselin On mechanisms of cultural evolution, and the evolution of language and the common law, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 11–11.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010177Howard E. Gruber Genes for general intellect rather than particular culture, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.0101 (Feb 2010): 11.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010189C. R. Hallpike The “culturgen”: Science or science fiction?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 12–13.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010190Daniel L. Hartl A too simple view of population genetics, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 13–14.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010207Timothy D. Johnston Concepts of development in the mathematics of cultural change, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 14–15.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010219Joseph K. Kovach From genes to culture: The missing links, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 15–17.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010220Geoffrey R. Loftus Top-down guidance from a bottom-up theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 17–18.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010232Hubert Markl The power of reduction and the limits of compressibility, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 18–19.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010244Roger D. Masters Toward a natural science of human culture, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 19–20.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010256J. Maynard Smith Mind and the linkage between genes and culture, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 20–21.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010268Robert Plutchik Genes, mind, and emotion, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 21–22.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0001027XAlexander Rosenberg Are there culturgens?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.0101 (Feb 2010): 22.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010281Glendon Schubert Epigenesis: The newer synthesis?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 24–25.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010293Joseph Shepher Collaboration between biology and the social sciences: A milestone, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 25–26.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0001030XL B. Slobodkin A bully pulpit, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 26–27.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010311Pierre L. van den Berghe Resistance to biological self-understanding, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 27–27.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010323Robert Van Gulick Information, feedback, and transparency, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 27–29.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010335Thomas Rhys Williams Genes, mind, and culture; A turning point, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 29–30.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010347Joachim F. Wohlwill The place of mind, and the limits of amplification, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 30–31.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010359Charles J. Lumsden, Edward O. Wilson Genes and culture, protest and communication, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5, no.11 (Feb 2010): 31–37.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00010360G. Schubert Infanticide by usurper hanuman langur males: A sociobiological myth, Social Science Information 21, no.22 (Mar 1982): 199–244.https://doi.org/10.1177/053901882021002002 Victor E. Flango , and Craig R. Ducat Toward an Integration of Public Law and Judicial Behavior, The Journal of Politics 39, no.11 (Oct 2015): 41–72.https://doi.org/10.2307/2129686Glendon Schubert Political Culture and Judicial Ideology, Comparative Political Studies 9, no.44 (Jan 1977): 363–408.https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407700900401 Sheldon Goldman and Thomas P. Jahnige Systems Analysis & Judicial Systems: Potential & Limitations, Polity 3, no.33 (Nov 2016): 334–359.https://doi.org/10.2307/3234115J. P. Nettl The State as a Conceptual Variable, World Politics 20, no.44 (Jul 2011): 559–592.https://doi.org/10.2307/2009684Glendon Schubert Political ideology on the high court, Politics 3, no.11 (Sep 2007): 21–40.https://doi.org/10.1080/00323266808401128J. Woodford Howard On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice, American Political Science Review 62, no.11 (Aug 2014): 43–56.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400115631J. Woodford Howard On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice, American Political Science Review 62, no.11 (Aug 2014): 43–56.https://doi.org/10.2307/1953325