Ideological Blinders in the Study of Sex Differences in Participation in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Fields

Abstract

Numerous theories have been developed to explain the lower participation of women than men in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, and associated programs have been developed to address this gap. The theories and programs are predicated on an implicit and, sometimes, explicit assumption that the gap has arisen as a result of stereotypes, implicit bias, microaggressions, or other social or ‘cultural’ factors that impede women’s entry into these fields or expel those who have entered them. These theories and programs are now a cottage industry in and of themselves, but if the assumptions underlying them are incorrect, they ironically ensure a continuing gap in STEM fields. We will briefly discuss this issue and relate some of our experiences attempting to publish data that runs counter to the prevailing views.