Abstract
The disintegration of the Soviet Union is an essential case for the study of ethnic mobilization. However, analyses in this article demonstrate that commonly-used measures of ethnic diversity show little consistent relationship with events of mass ethnic mobilization during the period 1987-1992 in either the ethnofederal regions of the Soviet Union or the federal regions of Russia. Instead, the analyses indicate that the degree to which regional populations spoke a metropolitan language was the driving force behind this mobilization. These findings are consistent with recent literature on identity politics, which holds that noticeable and difficult-to-change traits make certain identities politically salient. However, while this literature has largely focused on inherited physical characteristics, I argue that proficiency in a metropolitan language functions in a similar manner by marking non-speakers as outsiders and thus preventing their social mobility. Language may therefore underly much purportedly ethnic political behavior in states with linguistic cleavages.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have