Abstract

According to several theories of recognition it has been established that an individual counts on the feedback of another to seek identity recognition. According to G.W.F. Hegel (1977) the identity of an individual being does not rest solely in himself but in its relationship to other beings. In his opinion, consciousness of a self exists in being acknowledged by another self and true selfhood exists in acknowledging the requirements and rights of the other self. This paper aims at analyzing the identity recognition as a tragic flaw in William Shakespeare’s famous tragedy King Lear in the light of Hegel’s critiques of self and the other. In this context, King Lear’s attainment of true selfhood and self- knowledge is going to be visualized as the consequence of his effort for identity recognition and then undergoing an extreme suffering. The present research aims to explore the process or stages of becoming a victim of identity crisis. The crisis of recognition for the protagonist of the play starts right in the first scene. This paper aims at discussing the identity recognition on the part of King Lear himself and others in the play as a cause of tragedy. By using Hegel’s Master-Slave Dialectic, this paper will open up a new research direction for the Shakespearean scholars.

Highlights

  • Shakespeare narrates a story of an age old King of England wishing to retire from his responsibilities as a King

  • Consciousness of a self exists in being acknowledged by another self and true selfhood exists in acknowledging the requirements and rights of the other self

  • This paper aims at analyzing the identity recognition as a tragic flaw in William Shakespeare’s famous tragedy King Lear in the light of Hegel’s critiques of self and the other

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

He decides to hand over his kingdom to his three grown up daughters named Goneril, Regan and Cordelia. He puts up a question before his daughters to express their love for him and that whosoever loves him more gets more share of land. IJALEL 9(3): contains vindictive feeling against his brother Edgar who is his father’s legitimate son This situation leads to two more questions: Are there some other characters in the play facing the dilemma of identity recognition? The mode of the inquiry is going to be qualitative and analytical

SELF AND THE OTHER
KING LEAR AND IDENTITY CRISIS
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.