Abstract

This study investigated three Japanese L2 learners who joined a government-funded, short-term study abroad program in the USA during their first year of college. Four years after the program, we interviewed the learners about their overseas experiences. We also asked what they had done during their university years after the program. We then analyzed their accounts to explore participants’ linguistic and personal growth during and after the program. Their stories offered important insights into what short-term study abroad programs should provide: critical experiences that participants embrace through meeting and communicating with new people in L2s for the purpose of mutual understanding. When participants perceived their experiences to be successful and valuable and felt a desire to become a more efficient L2 user, they took actions to improve their L2 skills in relation to other life goals after returning home. Furthermore, their L2 identities are likely interwoven with their current and aspiring personal identities. As such, their stories are self-development trajectories and evidence of L2-learning-mediated personal growth through social interaction. We propose that short-term study programs: (a) avoid an exclusive focus on L2 learning on-site, (b) include ample opportunities of meaningful social interaction, and (c) target first-year students.

Highlights

  • Study abroad has been researched primarily in terms of language and intercultural gains as well as in foreign-language socialization (DuFon & Churchill, 2006; Freed, 1995; Kinginger, 2009, 2013)

  • Teachers and learners alike tend to assume that firsthand exposure to the target-language speech community, in addition to intensive L2 training, provides the best opportunities for language learning

  • Scholars have recognized the need for investigation, and research in this field has expanded to a wide range of language features as outcome variables, which include L2 speech fluency (Freed, Segalowitz, & Dewey, 2004), vocabulary growth (Collentine & Freed, 2004), pragmatic development (Kasper & Rose, 2002), intercultural competence (Jackson & Oguro, 2018), and ethnocentrism (Yashima, 2010), among others

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Study abroad has been researched primarily in terms of language and intercultural gains as well as in foreign-language socialization (DuFon & Churchill, 2006; Freed, 1995; Kinginger, 2009, 2013). Scholars have recognized the need for investigation, and research in this field has expanded to a wide range of language features as outcome variables, which include L2 speech fluency (Freed, Segalowitz, & Dewey, 2004), vocabulary growth (Collentine & Freed, 2004), pragmatic development (Kasper & Rose, 2002), intercultural competence (Jackson & Oguro, 2018), and ethnocentrism (Yashima, 2010), among others. Isabelli-García (2006) reported a difference in outcomes among participants in the same program, depending on individual motivation in L2 learning and attitudes toward the new cultures. Thorough examination of participants' study abroad experiences – including perceptions, interpretations, reflections, and evaluations – is needed to examine learning outcomes, assess existing programs, and enhance future study abroad programs

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call