Abstract

ABSTRACT This article advances conceptual debates regarding identity and marginalisation in valuable ways and informs methodological improvements for representation within data collection systems. It discusses findings from a study exploring the inclusion – and exclusion – of identity categories within official data collection exercises. A theme that emerged from the research was how intricacies present within the lived experiences of ethno-linguistic groups can be ignored through the application of broad – and more politically visible – identity categories, such as Muslim. Furthermore, some participants felt that identity categories were discouraged based on colonial legacies and British government priorities for diplomatic relations. One such identity category discussed here is Kashmiri, which despite an ongoing campaign for official recognition, remained absent from the list of ethnic categories used for quantifying populations in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, within the research findings, Somalis and Pashtuns were also highlighted as groups, who despite being recognised as distinct communities within the urban space and thus acknowledged categories of practice in daily interactions within neighbourhoods in the UK, remain ‘unofficial’.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.