Abstract

As the complexity of human-water systems interactions is increasing, the need for an integrated view on water-related issues becomes more important. In this study we focus on the qualitative description of human-water interactions with the aim to identify sensitive system variables which may alter the established water resource system. Qualitative system analysis based on extensive expert elicitation regarding reservoir management was applied to disclose the politics behind water management visions and measures and to identify sensitive system variables where the different perspectives of stakeholders and decision-makers enter the human-water system in response to environmental change and societal processes. This highlights the interplay of the distribution of water and the distribution of power which is central within human-water systems. The results are two-fold. First, we show, that such a qualitative approach is helpful in revealing sensitive system variables. Second, our analysis identifies i) perception of change, ii) risk to users, and iii) discrepancy of actual and desired level of reservoir as the sensitive system variables deciding about thresholds in the specific setting of our case study. Hereby, the case study highlights also the applicability and usability of our approach. Aiming at sustainable water management, knowledge about the sensitive system variables is crucial to understand the effects of different visions and, hence, action within the human-water system to cover the whole range of societal responses. While we applied this approach on a reservoir management example, we are confident that this approach is transferable to other water management cases for identifying the complexity of interactions, sensitive system variables, and critical variables of change and transformation.

Highlights

  • Sustainable water management systems aim at keeping the integrity of water-related ecosystems while at the same time meeting the needs and demands of the society over multiple generations (Wiek and Larson, 2012; Schneider et al, 2015; Poff et al, 2016)

  • Our results are based on the assumption that the humanwater system is a co-produced system, where the feedback and interlinkages between water users and water sources decide about the state of the human-hydro scape

  • We could identify sensitivity both from the natural system and the societal and managerial processes, the results focus especially on the latter as we find that the combination of pluralistic water research (PWR) approach and qualitative system analysis is the method of choice to identify the systems sensitivities from the human perspective and their perception of the natural system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sustainable water management systems aim at keeping the integrity of water-related ecosystems while at the same time meeting the needs and demands of the society over multiple generations (Wiek and Larson, 2012; Schneider et al, 2015; Poff et al, 2016). Reservoir management is a valuable example of such complex human-water interactions which needs to balance technical and natural perspectives, and social and political ones. Rather focuses on evaluating good practice examples than on analyzing the political and strategic decisions behind those practices (Zwarteveen et al, 2017). This strong focus on management solutions is masking the underlying political processes responsible for interventions and their outcomes (Wilson et al, 2019). Considering the plurality of framings and meanings is of utmost importance to understand the resilience or adaptive capacity of the human-water system when aiming at water sustainability under changing environmental and social conditions (Seidl et al, 2013; Xu et al, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call