Abstract

Facial thermal imaging is a non-contact technology which can be useful for ubiquitous deceptive anxiety recognition. To date, studies investigating this technology have produced equivocal results in classification accuracy and finding the most correlated regions on the face. This study was conducted using our dataset with 41 subjects using two different protocols and three modalities (thermal, GSR and PPG). We selected and tracked five regions of interest (ROI) on each facial thermal imprint including periorbital, forehead, cheek, perinasal and chin that were mostly used in previous papers. By employing six statistical features, four feature reduction techniques and three classifiers, we attempted to identify the ROIs which are mostly associated with activation of the sympathetic nervous system to increase the final classification accuracy rate. The results of linear classification models show significant improvement of classification accuracy by using ROC feature selection method. We achieved 90.1% and 74.7% accuracy rate for thermal features in mock crime and best friend scenarios, respectively. Our experimental results show that perinasal and cheek areas have greater discriminatory power in comparison with other ROIs on the face.

Highlights

  • Nowadays, deceptive behaviors are common in our global society

  • To address the above-mentioned issues, our study aims to propose a framework to investigate the effectiveness of facial thermal imaging in comparison with gold standard physiological measurement (GSR and PPG), and obtain the optimal regions of interest (ROI) selection in two deception detection scenarios

  • Interact. 2019, in Facial thermal imaging is the main non-invasive method that many researchers utilize for the Facial thermal imaging is the main non-invasive method that many researchers utilize for the purpose of detecting emotional and stress reactions [16,24,31]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most widely used technology for detecting deception is polygraphy; this relies on detecting changes in physiological signals, heart rate and is most commonly used method for lie detection [1]. There are some limitations that affect the effectiveness of polygraph in general applications: dependency on professional experts for scoring the data, attachment of sensors to the subjects that limit the length and nature of interview sessions—and which can cause high levels of anxiety in subjects in themselves. All of these drawbacks of polygraphy provide incentives to introduce substitute technologies. According to Cannon, this physiological reaction to acute stress is called the “fight or flight”

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call