Identifying Student Mistreatment Through Peer-Facilitated Learning Environment Sessions.

Abstract

Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Medical School Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) show persistent high rates of medical student mistreatment, and multiple barriers to student reporting of mistreatment exist. The authors examined whether learning environment sessions (LESs) allow students opportunities to identify and describe patterns of mistreatment missed by other avenues of reporting. Peer-facilitated LESs were instituted in 2018-2019 at Boston University School of Medicine. The LESs were scheduled once during every third-year core clerkship block. Third- and fourth-year students trained as peer-facilitators led discussions of topics relevant to the student clinical experience using a standardized facilitator guide. Minutes, including details of reported events, were completed during the session and visible to all students participating. These minutes were sent to clerkship leadership and the medical education office for action once student grades were submitted. Summative content analysis was conducted on 44 LES minutes from sessions held in January-November 2019. Reported incidents were categorized into broad categories of negative treatment (NT), negative learning environment (NLE), and positive learning environment (PLE). Sixty-three instances of NT were identified. Of these, 37 fit within the scope of the AAMC GQ mistreatment categories. The remaining 26 instances of NT were classified into 7 novel categories of medical student mistreatment. Instances of NLE were most discussed by students and categorized into 5 subthemes. Examples of PLE were categorized into 4 subthemes, which encompassed 11 descriptors of core qualities of an ideal preceptor or educational environment. LESs have aided in identifying and describing new patterns of mistreatment. They fulfill a unique role by allowing students to identify, analyze, and report mistreatment in a facilitated and protected space. Formal evaluations of institutional improvement in the learning environment, reduction in medical student mistreatment, and subsequent improvement in AAMC GQ data are needed.