Abstract

<p dir="ltr">Objective: To understand preferences for features of weight loss programmes among adults with, or at risk of, type 2 diabetes in the UK.</p><p dir="ltr">Research Design and Methods: A discrete choice experiment with 3,960 UK adults living with overweight, (675 with type 2 diabetes). Preferences for seven characteristics of weight loss programmes were analysed. Simulations from choice models using the experimental data predicted uptake of available weight loss programmes. Patient groups comprising those who have experience with weight loss programmes, including from minority communities, informed the experimental design.</p><p dir="ltr">Results: Preferences did not differ between people with or without type 2 diabetes. Preferences were strongest for the type of diet. Healthy eating was most preferred relative to total diet replacement (TDR) (OR=2.24, 95%CI: 2.04-2.44). Individual interventions were more popular than groups (OR=1.40, 95%CI: 1.34-1.47). People preferred programmes offering weight loss of 10-15 kg (OR=1.37, 95%CI: 1.28-1.47) compared with 2-5kg. Online content was preferred over in-person contacts (OR=1.24, 95%CI: 1.18-1.30). There were few differences in preferences by gender and ethnicity though weight loss was more important for women than for men, and individuals from ethnic minority populations identified more with programmes where others shared their characteristics. Modelling suggested that tailoring programmes to individual preferences could increase participation by around 17 percentage points (68% in relative terms).</p><p dir="ltr">Conclusions: Offering a range of weight loss programmes targeting the preferred attributes of different patient groups could potentially encourage more people to participate in weight loss programmes and support people living with overweight to reduce their weight.</p>

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.