Abstract

Accurate species identification in fossil remains is a complex task but is a key component for developing good inferences on many, if not all, fundamental questions in macroecology and macroevolution. In the Quaternary, arvicolines are very abundant remains in archeological and paleontological sites in Western Europe and their identification is often based on the first lower molar. The common vole Microtus arvalis (Pallas, 1778) and the field vole Microtus agrestis (Linnaeus, 1761) are commonly found in those deposits. These two species are genetically and ecologically divergent. Nonetheless, their lower molars, on which species identification is done, exhibit a large morphological variation that can potentially lead to some confusion and misinterpretation. Moreover, molecular data suggest that present-day M. agrestis populations are a complex of divergent lineages, some of them being recognized nowadays as valid species. On the basis of extant populations representing a large part of the present-day geographical distribution of these two species, we developed a classification model based on geometric morphometrics of the first lower molar. Our statistical model was then applied on four fossil sites selected to evaluate the relevance of taxonomic determination found in species lists. The model using landmarks describing the overall shape of the first lower molar classifies the two species with the smallest prediction error together with very high individual posterior probabilities. The obtained classification is much better than those arising from shapes of any specific molar part such as the anterior loop, asymmetry or peculiar triangle shape. Discrepancies with expert classification on fossils suggest that existing faunal lists should always be considered cautiously for these two species. Our morphometric model provides a first step towards a rationalized way of revising past collections and expertise for future small mammal assemblages. It will thus help us better understand the paleobiogeographical expansion of these two key species in Quaternary faunas.

Highlights

  • Developing good inferences from fossil remains, such as phylogeographic, biostratigraphical, bioclimatic or any evolutionary or ecological analysis based on fossil biodiversity, relies on an accurate taxonomic identification of fossil remains, whenever possible by assessing finer levels, such as species or sub-species

  • For the Fixed Landmarks (FL), shape changes associated to PC1 concern mainly behavior of lingual salient angles (LSAs), buccal salient angles (BSAs) and lingual reentrant angles (LRAs)

  • BSAs tend to mainly migrate vertically (Figure 3A). All these tendencies reflect the labio-lingual asymmetry in M. agrestis compared to M. arvalis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Developing good inferences from fossil remains, such as phylogeographic, biostratigraphical, bioclimatic or any evolutionary or ecological analysis based on fossil biodiversity, relies on an accurate taxonomic identification of fossil remains, whenever possible by assessing finer levels, such as species or sub-species. Such a postulate depends on the sensitivity of classification criteria and their actual variations within and between species. The common vole (Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1778) and the field vole (Microtus agrestis Linnaeus, 1761) are commonly found in these Quaternary deposits Today, they show a quite similar geographical distribution, M. agrestis being slightly more widespread, reaching higher latitudes such as Nordic areas [1]. It can burrow its galleries deeper than its counterpart (e.g., [2,3,4])

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call