Abstract

Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) were initially developed to inform decision processes relating to climate change and then extended to other natural resource management decisions, including issues around integrated water resources management. Despite their intention to support long-term planning decisions, model uptake has generally been limited, partly due to their unfulfilled capability to manage deep uncertainty issues and consider multiple perspectives and trade-offs involved when solving problems of interest. In recent years, more emphasis has been put on the need for existing models to evolve to be used for exploratory modeling and analysis to capture and manage deep uncertainty. Building new models is a solution but may face challenges in terms of feasibility and the conservation of knowledge assets. Integration and augmentation of existing models is another solution, but little guidance exists on how to realize model augmentation that addresses deep uncertainty and how to use such models for exploratory modeling purposes. To provide guidance on how to augment existing models to support decisions under deep uncertainty we present an approach for identifying minimum information requirements (MIRs) that consists of three steps: (1) invoking a decision support framework [here, Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways (DAPP)] to synthesize information requirements, (2) characterizing misalignment with an existing integrated model, (3) designing adjustable solutions that align model output with immediate information needs. We employ the Basin Futures model to set up the approach and illustrate outcomes in terms of its effectiveness to augment models for exploratory purposes, as well as its potential for supporting the design of adaptative pathways. The results are illustrated in the context of the Brahmani River Basin (BRB) system and discussed in terms of generalization and transferability of the approach to identifying MIRs. Future work directions include the refinement and evaluation of the approach in a planning context and testing of the approach with other models.

Highlights

  • Supporting sustainable societies requires integrated approaches and informative decision support tools to manage the complexity and uncertainties associated with socio-ecological systems (SES)

  • We have presented a minimum information requirements (MIRs) approach to guide and orchestrate model augmentation for exploratory modeling and analysis, employing the Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways (DAPP) framework for the orchestration process

  • The Basin Futures software was used as a case study in the context of the Brahmani River Basin (BRB) to illustrate details of the approach and associated results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Supporting sustainable societies requires integrated approaches and informative decision support tools to manage the complexity and uncertainties associated with socio-ecological systems (SES). At the river basin scale, they have been used to address water resources planning and management challenges (e.g., Jakeman and Letcher, 2003; Giupponi, 2006) and as experimental laboratories to “explore the linkages and feedbacks between different system components, including the social, economic, and ecological implications of different natural or anthropogenic factors” (Hamilton et al, 2015) It is that latter scale and use that is addressed here when considering IAMs. It is that latter scale and use that is addressed here when considering IAMs Despite their intention to account holistically for multiple factors and optimally balance conflicting trade-offs associated with different uses of natural resources, model uptake has generally been limited (McIntosh et al, 2011). One reason may be their perceived limitations in providing relevant and actionable information to managers and decision makers, especially when considering long-term events, and misalignment with decisionmaker perspectives (Van Voorn et al, 2016). Expanding the capability of IAMs in the integration of diverse perspectives is expected to benefit the perceived quality of the information they provide and enhance their use (Bauler, 2012; Van Voorn et al, 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.