Identifying medical school applicants from ethnic minorities

Abstract

ABSTRACT Two studies of applicants to United Kingdom medical schools show that ethnic origin of surnames is reliably assessable by independent judges, and that surnames are valid indicators of ethnic origin as determined by self-classification, showing very high specificity (97%) and slightly lesser sensitivity (84%). Ethnic origin can also be determined from residential information derived from post-codes and place of birth, information in each case being highly specific (99% and 98%) but lacking in sensitivity (25% and 33%). The addition of place of birth and post-code data to surnames provides an increase in overall sensitivity (90%) with no improvement in specificity (94%). A comparison of survey respondents and nonrespondents shows that applicants from ethnic minorities are somewhat less likely to respond than non-minority applicants, although the effect is small. Responding applicants from ethnic minorities reply as quickly as non-minority applicants. Our survey confirms the feasibility of direct monitoring of the ethnic origin of applicants by asking applicants to complete a short questionnaire, and of its indirect monitoring by the use of surname. Both UCCA (Universities' Central Council on Admissions) and PCAS (Polytechnic Central Admissions System) have announced that they will instigate the ethnic monitoring of applicants for admission in autumn 1990.