Abstract

This chapter describes a study that compares two approaches (self‐reported effort [SRE] and response time effort [RTE]) for identifying low‐effort examinees in student learning outcomes assessment. Although both approaches equally discriminated from measures of ability (e.g., SAT scores), RTE was found to have a stronger relationship with test performance, identified more low‐effort examinees, and led to higher mean performance upon filtering than the SRE approach.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call