Abstract
The inability of standard models to explain the flux ratios in many 4-image gravitational lenses has been cited as evidence for significant small-scale structure in lens galaxies. That claim has generally relied on detailed lens modeling, so it is both model dependent and somewhat difficult to interpret. We present a more robust and generic method for identifying lenses with small-scale structure. For a close triplet of images associated with a source near a cusp caustic, the sum of the signed magnifications should approximately vanish. We derive realistic upper bounds on the sum, and argue that lenses with flux ratios that significiantly violate the bounds can be said to have structure in the lens potential on scales smaller than the image separation. Five observed lenses have such flux ratio ``anomalies'': B2045+265, 1RXS J1131-1231, and SDSS J0924+0219 have strong anomalies; B0712+472 has a strong anomaly at optical/near-IR wavelengths and a marginal anomaly at radio wavelengths; and RX J0911+0551 appears to have an anomaly, but this conclusion is subject to uncertainties about octopole modes in early-type galaxies. Analysis of the cusp relation does not identify the known anomaly in B1422+231, so methods that are more sophisticated (and less generic) than the cusp relation may be necessary to uncover flux ratio anomalies in some systems. Although these flux ratio anomalies might represent milli- or micro-lensing, we cannot identify the cause; we can only conclude that the lenses have significant structure in the potential on scales smaller than the separation between the images. Additional arguments must be invoked to specify the nature of this small-scale structure. [Abridged]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.