Abstract

BackgroundTo understand the public sentiment regarding the Zika virus, social media can be leveraged to understand how positive, negative, and neutral sentiments are expressed in society. Specifically, understanding the characteristics of negative sentiment could help inform federal disease control agencies’ efforts to disseminate relevant information to the public about Zika-related issues.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to analyze the public sentiment concerning Zika using posts on Twitter and determine the qualitative characteristics of positive, negative, and neutral sentiments expressed.MethodsMachine learning techniques and algorithms were used to analyze the sentiment of tweets concerning Zika. A supervised machine learning classifier was built to classify tweets into 3 sentiment categories: positive, neutral, and negative. Tweets in each category were then examined using a topic-modeling approach to determine the main topics for each category, with focus on the negative category.ResultsA total of 5303 tweets were manually annotated and used to train multiple classifiers. These performed moderately well (F1 score=0.48-0.68) with text-based feature extraction. All 48,734 tweets were then categorized into the sentiment categories. Overall, 10 topics for each sentiment category were identified using topic modeling, with a focus on the negative sentiment category.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates how sentiment expressed within discussions of epidemics on Twitter can be discovered. This allows public health officials to understand public sentiment regarding an epidemic and enables them to address specific elements of negative sentiment in real time. Our negative sentiment classifier was able to identify tweets concerning Zika with 3 broad themes: neural defects,Zika abnormalities, and reports and findings. These broad themes were based on domain expertise and from topics discussed in journals such as Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report and Vaccine. As the majority of topics in the negative sentiment category concerned symptoms, officials should focus on spreading information about prevention and treatment research.

Highlights

  • BackgroundZika was discovered in 1947 in Uganda [1]

  • Tweets were preprocessed by removing non-American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) characters, capital letters, retweet indicators, numbers, screen handles (@username), punctuation, URLs, whitespaces, single characters such as p that do not convey any meaning about topics in the corpus, and stop words such as and, so, etc

  • The topic modeling results for the positive, neutral, and negative categories is explored with a focus on the themes that emerged in the negative sentiment category

Read more

Summary

Introduction

BackgroundZika was discovered in 1947 in Uganda [1]. From the 1960s to 1980s, only 14 cases were diagnosed across Asia and Africa, and it typically caused mild symptoms [2]. Cases were likely underreported from 1947 to 2008 because the symptoms were similar to chikungunya and dengue It was not until this most recent outbreak that Zika was linked to Guillain-Barré syndrome and microcephaly [1]. Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the public sentiment concerning Zika using posts on Twitter and determine the qualitative characteristics of positive, negative, and neutral sentiments expressed. Our negative sentiment classifier was able to identify tweets concerning Zika with 3 broad themes: neural defects,Zika abnormalities, and reports and findings. These broad themes were based on domain expertise and from topics discussed in journals such as Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report and Vaccine. As the majority of topics in the negative sentiment category concerned symptoms, officials should focus on spreading information about prevention and treatment research

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call