Abstract
ABSTRACT This article aims to contribute to a better understanding of investigative journalism by proposing a multi-step method for identifying investigative pieces, despite the genre’s blurred definition. This method uses internal criteria observable in the texts themselves, regardless of their author, awards received, label, or discourses about them. Based on a literature review, an exploratory analysis and practical testing, we claim that examining articles’ underlying sources provides a set of criteria that allows researchers to select and exclude pieces in a flexible yet consistent way. When applied to a nine-month sample, the method allowed us to create a corpus showing great thematic, methodological and narrative diversity. Moving away from an elitist conception of investigative journalism, our corpus analysis shows that investigative journalism transcends the traditional boundaries of discursive genre. Furthermore, since the corpus includes both small and large investigations, it provides researchers with the first opportunity to observe empirically the varying degrees of investigative journalism.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.