Abstract

Identification of influential spreaders is still a challenging issue in network science. Therefore, it attracts increasing attention from both computer science and physical societies, and many algorithms to identify influential spreaders have been proposed so far. Degree centrality, as the most widely used neighborhood-based centrality, was introduced into the network world to evaluate the spreading ability of nodes. However, degree centrality always assigns too many nodes with the same value, so it leads to the problem of resolution limitation in distinguishing the real influences of these nodes, which further affects the ranking efficiency of the algorithm. The k-shell decomposition method also faces the same problem. In order to solve the resolution limit problem, we propose a high-resolution index combining both degree centrality and the k-shell decomposition method. Furthermore, based on the proposed index and the well-known gravity law, we propose an improved gravity model to measure the importance of nodes in propagation dynamics. Experiments on ten real networks show that our model outperforms most of the state-of-the-art methods. It has a better performance in terms of ranking performance as measured by the Kendall’s rank correlation, and in terms of ranking efficiency as measured by the monotonicity value.

Highlights

  • Identification of influential spreaders is still a challenging issue in network science

  • Based on the proposed index and the well-known gravity law, we propose an improved gravity model to measure the importance of nodes in propagation dynamics

  • degree ­centrality17 (DC) and k-shell decomposition m­ ethod18 (KS) always assigns too many nodes with the same value, which leads to the problem of resolution limitation in distinguishing the real influences of these nodes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Identification of influential spreaders is still a challenging issue in network science. Experiments on ten real networks show that our model outperforms most of the state-of-the-art methods It has a better performance in terms of ranking performance as measured by the Kendall’s rank correlation, and in terms of ranking efficiency as measured by the monotonicity value. Whether the degree or k-shell value is regarded as the mass, there is a shortcoming, i.e., DC and KS both assign too many nodes with the same value It leads to the problem of resolution limitation in distinguishing the real influences of these nodes, which further affects the ranking efficiency of the algorithm. Experiments on ten real networks show that our model performs best in comparison with the above well-known state-of-the-art methods both in terms of ranking performance as measured by the Kendall’s rank correlation, and in terms of ranking efficiency as measured by the monotonicity value

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.