Abstract

Erdafitinib, a pan‐fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in adult patients with specific FGFR3/2 genetic alterations who progressed during or after ≥1 line of prior platinum‐containing chemotherapy (PCC), including within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant PCC. Concordance between the clinical trial assay (CTA) used in a phase 2 study and QIAGEN's therascreen® FGFR kit (a two‐step, multiplex, real‐time, RT‐PCR assay), the FDA‐approved companion diagnostic (CDx) with erdafitinib, was evaluated in this bridging study. Study samples included 100 CTA‐confirmed FGFR‐positive samples from 100 erdafitinib‐treated mUC patients, plus 200 CTA‐confirmed FGFR‐negative samples from the phase 2 study. The primary objective was met if the lower bound of 95% CI of objective response rate (ORR) in CDx‐confirmed patients with FGFR alterations was >25%. Demographics were similar between the bridging study and CTA‐screened patients. In total, 292 of 300 samples (97.3%) with valid CDx results showed high analytical concordance versus CTA (percent agreement [95% CI]: positive percent agreement, 87.2 [79.0; 92.5]; negative percent agreement, 97.0 [93.5; 98.6]; overall percent agreement, 93.8 [90.5; 96.1]). Investigator‐assessed ORR in the 81 CDx‐identified, erdafitinib‐treated patients who tested positive for both assays was 45.7% (95% CI: 35.3%; 56.5%) versus 40.4% (95% CI: 30.7%; 50.1%) for CTA and met the criteria for primary objective. High ORR and clinical concordance to CTA suggest that QIAGEN's CDx can reliably select mUC patients who would potentially benefit from erdafitinib treatment.

Highlights

  • Treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma in patients who are cisplatin-ineligible or cisplatin-refractory represents a significant unmet medical need

  • Given the differences in assay design and instrument platform between the clinical trial assay (CTA) and QIAGEN’s CDx assay, a bridging study was designed to compare the clinical performance of the CDx versus the CTA, establish agreement between two assays and evaluate clinical efficacy outcome of erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) identified with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alteration using the CDx

  • The therascreen® FGFR kit (CDx) developed by QIAGEN is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test for the detection of four-point mutations (R248C, S249C, G370C, and Y373C) and five fusions (TACC3_V1, TACC3_V3, BAIAP2L1, CASP7, and BICC1) in the FGFR2/3 genes. It is a two-step, multiplex, real-time Reverse transcription (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test designed to detect FGFR alterations in RNA derived from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) UC tissue samples archived during the BLC2001 study [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in patients who are cisplatin-ineligible or cisplatin-refractory represents a significant unmet medical need. In a phase 2 study (BLC2001; NCT02365597), erdafitinib demonstrated a clinically meaningful objective response rate (ORR) and an acceptable safety profile, emerging as a first-in-class treatment for patients with surgically unresectable or mUC harboring FGFR mutations/ fusions [8]. Based on these results, erdafitinib was granted accelerated US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for locally advanced or mUC in adult patients with susceptible FGFR3/2 genetic alterations, whose disease progressed during or following ≥1 line of platinum-containing chemotherapy (PCC), including within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant PCC [9]. Given the differences in assay design and instrument platform between the CTA and QIAGEN’s CDx assay, a bridging study was designed to compare the clinical performance of the CDx versus the CTA, establish agreement between two assays and evaluate clinical efficacy outcome of erdafitinib in patients with locally advanced or mUC identified with FGFR alteration using the CDx

Materials and methods
Study design and population
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call