Identifying 'fast progressors' likely to benefit from mechanical thrombectomy

Abstract

ObjectivesAlthough the effect of mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusions has been clearly demonstrated, there are different opinions about the treatment of patients with low ASPECT scores. We conducted this research to explore the utility of mechanical thrombectomy for the fast progressor patients. MethodsWe evaluated 394 patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) who applied to our center between 2012 and 2020 retrospectively. Patients with posterior system stroke and who admitted 6 h after the onset of symptoms, were not included in the study. The remaining 256 patients were divided into two groups as computed tomography angiography source image Alberta stroke program early computer tomography score (CTA-SI ASPECT) ≤ 6 and > 6. Modified rankin scale (mRS) 0–2 defined as good clinical outcome. Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score 2c-3 was accepted as successful recanalization. ResultsThe mean age of the patients in the fast-progressive group (23.4%; n = 60) was 66.3 ± 11.6 years, whereas the mean age of the CTA-SI ASPECTS > 6 group (76.6%; n = 196) was 62.4 ± 12.8 years (p = 0.034) A statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding 90-day mRS (p < 0.001). Whereas 61.7% of the patients with a CTA-SI ASPECTS > 6 had a 90-day mRS 0–2, this rate was 28.3% for patients with a CTA-SI ASPECTS ≤ 6. ConclusionAccording to our study, approximately 1/3 of patients with ASPECTS ≤ 6 benefit from mechanical thrombectomy. In this patient group, age emerged as a determinant of good clinical outcome.