Identifying Epitope Sites on the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2

The COVID-19 pandemic and SARS-CoV-2 variants have dramatically illustrated the need for a better understanding of antigen (epitope)-antibody (paratope) interactions. To gain insight into the immunogenic characteristics of epitopic sites (ES), we systematically investigated the structures of 340 Abs and 83 nanobodies (Nbs) complexed with the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. We identified 23 distinct ES on the RBD surface and determined the frequencies of amino acid usage in the corresponding CDR paratopes. We describe a clustering method for analysis of ES similarities that reveals binding motifs of the paratopes and that provides insights for vaccine design and therapies for SARS-CoV-2, as well as a broader understanding of the structural basis of Ab-protein antigen (Ag) interactions.

The COVID-19 pandemic and SARS-CoV-2 variants have dramatically illustrated the need for a better understanding of antigen (epitope)-antibody (paratope) interactions. To gain insight into the immunogenic characteristics of epitopic sites (ES), we systematically investigated the structures of 340 Abs and 83 nanobodies (Nbs) complexed with the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. We identified 23 distinct ES on the RBD surface and determined the frequencies of amino acid usage in the corresponding CDR paratopes. We describe a clustering method for analysis of ES similarities that reveals binding motifs of the paratopes and that provides insights for vaccine design and therapies for SARS-CoV-2, as well as a broader understanding of the structural basis of Ab-protein antigen (Ag) interactions.

The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has compelled extraordinary attention to the development of therapeutic reagents. The favorable physical properties of nanobodies make them attractive candidates for investigations of their ability to block viral entry. By X-ray crystallography we determined the structural basis of the interaction of a panel of synthetic nanobodies (Sb14, Sb16, Sb45 and Sb68) with the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD): binary complexes of Sb16–RBD and Sb45–RBD; a ternary complex of Sb14–RBD–Sb68, and Sb45–RBD–Sb68. Sb16 and Sb45 bind the RBD with identical footprints with ACE2, but their complementarity determining regions (CDR)2 and CDR3 are oriented diametrically oppositely. The ternary structure of the Sb45-RBD-Sb68 complex indicates that Sb45 binds squarely at the ACE2 interface, whereas Sb68 attaches toward the ACE2 interface's perimeter. The ternary configuration suggests that several sybodies may capture a sizable portion of the RBD's surface. These sybody structures provided structural insights that were used to create novel, highly potent biparatopic nanobodies and bivalent molecules with ACE2 and ACE2 binding scaffold mimicking miniproteins that bind the RBD with high affinity and neutralize SARS-CoV-2 and variants. Supported by the Intramural research program of the NIAID/NIH

Article Figures and data Abstract eLife digest Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods Data availability References Decision letter Author response Article and author information Metrics Abstract Neutralizing antibodies elicited by prior infection or vaccination are likely to be key for future protection of individuals and populations against SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, passively administered antibodies are among the most promising therapeutic and prophylactic anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents. However, the degree to which SARS-CoV-2 will adapt to evade neutralizing antibodies is unclear. Using a recombinant chimeric VSV/SARS-CoV-2 reporter virus, we show that functional SARS-CoV-2 S protein variants with mutations in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and N-terminal domain that confer resistance to monoclonal antibodies or convalescent plasma can be readily selected. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 S variants that resist commonly elicited neutralizing antibodies are now present at low frequencies in circulating SARS-CoV-2 populations. Finally, the emergence of antibody-resistant SARS-CoV-2 variants that might limit the therapeutic usefulness of monoclonal antibodies can be mitigated by the use of antibody combinations that target distinct neutralizing epitopes. eLife digest The new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, which causes the disease COVID-19, has had a serious worldwide impact on human health. The virus was virtually unknown at the beginning of 2020. Since then, intense research efforts have resulted in sequencing the coronavirus genome, identifying the structures of its proteins, and creating a wide range of tools to search for effective vaccines and therapies. Antibodies, which are immune molecules produced by the body that target specific segments of viral proteins can neutralize virus particles and trigger the immune system to kill cells infected with the virus. Several technologies are currently under development to exploit antibodies, including vaccines, blood plasma from patients who were previously infected, manufactured antibodies and more. The spike proteins on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 are considered to be prime antibody targets as they are accessible and have an essential role in allowing the virus to attach to and infect host cells. Antibodies bind to spike proteins and some can block the virus' ability to infect new cells. But some viruses, such as HIV and influenza, are able to mutate their equivalent of the spike protein to evade antibodies. It is unknown whether SARS-CoV-2 is able to efficiently evolve to evade antibodies in the same way. Weisblum, Schmidt et al. addressed this question using an artificial system that mimics natural infection in human populations. Human cells grown in the laboratory were infected with a hybrid virus created by modifying an innocuous animal virus to contain the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and treated with either manufactured antibodies or antibodies present in the blood of recovered COVID-19 patients. In this situation, only viruses that had mutated in a way that allowed them to escape the antibodies were able to survive. Several of the virus mutants that emerged had evolved spike proteins in which the segments targeted by the antibodies had changed, allowing these mutant viruses to remain undetected. An analysis of more than 50,000 real-life SARS-CoV-2 genomes isolated from patient samples further showed that most of these virus mutations were already circulating, albeit at very low levels in the infected human populations. These results show that SARS-CoV-2 can mutate its spike proteins to evade antibodies, and that these mutations are already present in some virus mutants circulating in the human population. This suggests that any vaccines that are deployed on a large scale should be designed to activate the strongest possible immune response against more than one target region on the spike protein. Additionally, antibody-based therapies that use two antibodies in combination should prevent the rise of viruses that are resistant to the antibodies and maintain the long-term effectiveness of vaccines and therapies. Introduction Neutralizing antibodies are a key component of adaptive immunity against many viruses that can be elicited by natural infection or vaccination (Plotkin, 2010). Antibodies can also be administered as recombinantly produced proteins or as convalescent plasma to confer a state of passive immunity in prophylactic or therapeutic settings. These paradigms are of particular importance given the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, and the devastating COVID19 pandemic that has ensued. Indeed, interventions to interrupt SARS-CoV-2 replication and spread are urgently sought, and passively administered antibodies are currently among the most promising therapeutic and prophylactic antiviral agents. Moreover, an understanding of the neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 is critical for the elicitation of effective and durable immunity by vaccination (Kellam and Barclay, 2020). Recent studies have shown that related, potently neutralizing monoclonal antibodies that recognize the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) are often elicited in SARS-CoV-2 infection (Robbiani et al., 2020; Brouwer et al., 2020; Cao et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020; Chi et al., 2020; Rogers et al., 2020; Shi et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020a; Wec et al., 2020; Kreer et al., 2020; Hansen et al., 2020; Ju et al., 2020; Seydoux et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Zost et al., 2020). These antibodies have great potential to be clinically impactful in the treatment and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The low levels of somatic hypermutation and repetitive manner in which similar antibodies (e.g. those based on IGHV3-53 Robbiani et al., 2020; Barnes et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2020) have been isolated from COVID19 convalescents suggests that potently neutralizing responses should be readily elicited. Paradoxically, a significant fraction of COVID19 convalescents, including some from whom potent neutralizing antibodies have been cloned, exhibit low levels of plasma neutralizing activity (Robbiani et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020b; Luchsinger et al., 2020). Together, these findings suggest that natural SARS-CoV-2 infection may often fail to induce sufficient B-cell expansion and maturation to generate high-titer neutralizing antibodies. The degree to, and pace at which SARS-CoV-2 might evolve to escape neutralizing antibodies is unclear. The aforementioned considerations raise the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 evolution might be influenced by frequent encounters with sub-optimal concentrations of potently neutralizing antibodies during natural infection. Moreover, the widespread use of convalescent plasma containing unknown, and often suboptimal, levels of neutralizing antibodies might also increase the acquisition of neutralizing antibody resistance by circulating SARS-CoV-2 populations (Bloch et al., 2020; Al‐Riyami et al., 2020). Reinfection of previously infected individuals who have incomplete or waning serological immunity might similarly drive emergence of antibody escape variants. As human neutralizing antibodies are discovered and move into clinical development as therapeutics and prophylactics, and immunogens based on prototype SARS-CoV-2 spike protein sequences are deployed as vaccines, it is important to anticipate patterns of antibody resistance that might arise. Here, we describe a recombinant chimeric virus approach that can rapidly generate and evaluate SARS-CoV-2 S mutants that escape antibody neutralization. We show that mutations conferring resistance to convalescent plasma or RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies can be readily generated in vitro. Notably, these antibody resistance mutations are present at low frequency in natural populations. Importantly, the use of candidate monoclonal antibody combinations that target distinct epitopes on the RBD (and therefore have non-overlapping resistance mutations) can suppress the emergence of antibody resistance. Results Selection of SARS-CoV-2 S variants using a replication-competent VSV/SARS-CoV-2 chimeric virus To select SARS-CoV-2 S variants that escape neutralization by antibodies, we used a recently described replication-competent chimeric virus based on vesicular stomatitis virus that encodes the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein and green fluorescent protein (rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP) (Schmidt et al., 2020). Notably, rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP replicates rapidly and to high-titers (107 to 108 PFU/ml within 48 hr), mimics the SARS-CoV-2 requirement for ACE-2 as a receptor, and is neutralized by COVID19 convalescent plasma and SARS-CoV-2 S-specific human monoclonal antibodies (Schmidt et al., 2020). The replication of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP can be readily monitored and measured by GFP fluorescence and the absence of proof-reading activity in the viral polymerase (VSV-L) results in the generation of virus stocks with greater diversity than authentic SARS-CoV-2, for an equivalent viral population size. These features facilitate experiments to investigate the ability S protein variants to escape antibody neutralization. We used two adapted, high-titer variants of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP, (namely rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP1D7 and rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP2E1) (Schmidt et al., 2020) in attempts to derive antibody-resistant mutants. Virus populations containing 1 × 106 infectious particles were generated following three passages to generated sequence diversity. On the third passage, cells were infected at an MOI of ~ 0.5 and progeny harvested after as short a time as possible so as to minimize phenotypic mixing in the viral population and to maximize the concordance between the genome sequence and the S protein sequence represented in a given virion particle. Because the mutation rate of VSV is ~ 10−4 to 10−5/base per replication cycle (Steinhauer and Holland, 1986; Steinhauer et al., 1989; Combe and Sanjuán, 2014), we estimated that this procedure should generate a large fraction of the possible replication-competent mutants within a population size of 1 × 106. The viral populations were then incubated with antibodies to neutralize susceptible variants (Figure 1A). For monoclonal antibodies, viral populations were incubated with antibodies at 5 μg/ml or 10 μg/ml, (~1000 to 10,000 x IC50) so as to minimize the number of infection events by antibody sensitive variants, and enable rapid selection of the most resistant rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP variants from the starting population. For plasma samples, the possibility existed that multiple different antibody specificities could be present, that might interfere with the outgrowth of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP variants that were resistant to the most prevalent or potent antibodies in the plasma. Therefore, in these selection experiments, viruses were incubated with a range of plasma dilutions (see materials and methods). Neutralized viral populations were then applied to 293T/ACE2(B) cells (Schmidt et al., 2020), which support robust rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP replication, and incubated for 48 hr. We used three potent human monoclonal antibodies C121, C135, and C144 (Robbiani et al., 2020), that are candidates for clinical development (Table 1). In addition, we used four convalescent plasma samples, three of which were from the same donors from which C121, C135, and C144, were obtained (Robbiani et al., 2020; Table 1). Two of these plasmas (COV-47 and COV-72) were potently neutralizing while the third (COV-107) had low neutralizing activity. A fourth convalescent plasma sample (COV-NY) was potently neutralizing but did not have a corresponding monoclonal antibody (Table 1). Figure 1 Download asset Open asset Selection of SARS-CoV-2 S mutations that confer antibody resistance. (A) Outline of serial passage experiments with replication-competent VSV derivatives encoding the SARS-CoV-2 S envelope glycoprotein and a GFP reporter (rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP) in 293T/ACE2(B) cells in the presence of neutralizing antibodies or plasma. Each passage experiment was performed twice (once each with rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP1D7 and rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP2E1.) (B) Representative images of 293T/ACE2(B) cells infected with 1 × 106 PFU of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP in the presence or absence of 10 μg/ml of the monoclonal antibody C121. (C) Expanded view of the boxed areas showing individual plaques of putatively antibody-resistant viruses. Table 1 Plasma and monoclonal antibodies used in this study. DonorPlasma NT50 (rVSV-SARSCoV2/GFP)Plasma NT50 HIV/CCNGnLucMonoclonal antibodyCOV-4766228016C144COV-7262747982C135COV-107122334C121COV-NY126147505ND Infection with rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP in the presence of the monoclonal antibodies C121 or C144 reduced the number of infectious units from 106 to a few hundred, as estimated by the frequency of GFP-positive cells (Figure 1B) a reduction of > 1000 fold. C135 reduced infection by ~ 100 fold. Imaging of wells infected with rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP in the presence of C121 or C144 revealed a small number of foci (~10 to 20/well), that suggested viral spread following initial infection (Figure 1B). In the case of C135, a greater number of GFP-positive cells were detected, obscuring the visualization of focal viral spread following initial infection. Aliquots of supernatants from these passage-1 (p1) cultures were collected 48 hr after infection, diluted in the same concentrations of monoclonal antibodies that were initially employed, and used to infect fresh (p2) cultures (Figure 1A). For p2 cultures, almost all cells became infected within 48 hr, suggesting the possible outgrowth of monoclonal antibody escape variants that were present in the original viral populations. For selection in the presence of plasma, p1 supernatants were harvested at 48 hr after infection in the presence of the highest concentrations of plasma that permitted infection of reasonable numbers (approximately 10%) of cells. Then, p2 cultures were established using p1 supernatants, diluted in the same concentrations of plasma used in p1. This approach led to clear 'escape' for the COV-NY plasma with prolific viral growth in p2 as evidenced by a large increase in the number of GFP-positive cells. For COV-47, COV-72, and CO107, plasma clearly retained at least some inhibitory activity in p2. Thereafter, p3 cultures and p4 cultures were established for COV-47, COV-72, and COV-107 plasmas at 5-fold higher concentrations of plasma than were used in p1 and p2 cultures (Figure 1A). RNA was extracted from p2 supernatants (monoclonal antibodies and COV-NY plasma) as well as later passages for the COV-47, COV-72, and COV-107 plasma selections. Sequences encoding either the RBD or the complete S protein were amplified using PCR and analyzed by Sanger and/or Illumina sequencing. For all three monoclonal antibodies and two of the four plasmas, sequence analyses revealed clear evidence for selection, with similar or identical mutants emerging in the presence of monoclonal antibodies or plasma in both rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP1D7 and rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP2E1 cultures (Figure 2A–D, Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,B, Figure 2—figure supplement 2A,B, Table 2). In the case of C121, mutations E484K and Q493K/R within the RBD were present at high frequencies in both p2 selected populations, with mutation at a proximal position (F490L) present in one p2 population (Figure 2A, Table 2). Viruses passaged in the presence of monoclonal antibody C144 also had mutations at positions E484 and Q493, but not at F490 (Figure 2C, Table 2). In contrast, virus populations passaged in the presence of monoclonal antibody C135 lacked mutations at E484 or Q493, and instead had mutations R346K/S/L and N440K at high frequency (Figure 2C, Table 2). Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all Download asset Open asset Analysis of S-encoding sequences following rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP replication in the presence of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. (A–D) Graphs depict the S codon position (X-axis) and the frequency of non-synonymous substitutions (Y-axis) following the second passage (p2) of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP on 293T/ACE2(B) cells in the absence of antibody or plasma (A), or in the presence of 10 μg/ml C121 (B), C135 (C) or C144 (D). Results are shown for both rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP variants (One replicate each for rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP1D7 and rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP2E1 - the frequency of 1D7 mutations is plotted as circles and 2E1 mutations as triangles). Table 2 Mutations occurring at high frequency during rVSV/SARS-CoV-2 passage in the presence of neutralizing antibodies or plasma. Mutant frequencyMutationp2p3p4Monoclonal antibodiesC121E484K*0.50, 0.39–†–F490L0.23Q493K0.12, 0.45C135N440K0.31, 0.30––R346S0.30, 0.17R346K0.22, 0.53R346M0.16C144E484K0.44, 0.18––Q493K0.31, 0.39Q493R0.17, 0.37PlasmasCOV47N148S0.16, 0.140.29, 0.300.72, 0.14K150R0.100.18K150E0.040.160.4K150T0.22K150Q0.160.22S151P0.10.180.2COV-NYK444R0.20,0.19––K444N0.14K444Q0.33V445E0.18 *Values represent the decimal frequency with which each mutation occurs ass assessed by NGS, two values indicate occurrences in both rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP1D7 and rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP2E1 cultures, single values indicate occurrence in only one culture. † –, not done. Mutations at specific positions were enriched in viruses passaged in the presence of convalescent plasma, in two out of four cases (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,B, Figure 2—figure supplement 2A,B, Table 2). Specifically, virus populations passaged in the presence of COV-NY plasma had mutations within RBD encoding sequence (K444R/N/Q and V445E) that were abundant at p2 (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A,B, Table 2). Conversely, mutations outside the RBD, specifically at N148S, K150R/E/T/Q and S151P in the N-terminal domain (NTD) were present at modest frequency in COV-47 p2 cultures and became more abundant at p3 and p4 (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,B, Table 2). Replication in the presence of COV72 or COV107 plasma did not lead to the clear emergence of escape mutations, suggesting that the neutralization by these plasmas was not due to one dominant antibody specificity. In the case of COV107, the failure of escape mutants to emerge may simply be due to the lack of potency of that plasma (Table 1). However, in the case of COV-72, combinations of antibodies may be responsible for the potent neutralizing properties of the plasma in that case. Isolation and characterization of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP antibody escape mutants Based on the aforementioned analyses, supernatants from C121, C144, and C135 and COV-NY plasma p2 cultures, or COV47 p4 cultures, contained mixtures of putative rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP neutralization escape mutants. To isolate individual mutants, the supernatants were serially diluted and individual viral foci isolated by limiting dilution in 96-well plates. Numerous individual rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP1D7 and rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP2E1 derivatives were harvested from wells containing a single virus plaque, expanded on 293T/ACE2(B) cells, then RNA was extracted and subjected to Sanger-sequencing (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). This process verified the purity of the individual rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP variants and yielded a number of viral mutants for further analysis (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). These plaque-purified viral mutants all encoded single amino-acid substitutions in S-coding sequences that corresponded to variants found at varying frequencies (determined by Illumina sequencing) in the antibody-selected viral populations. Notably, each of the isolated rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP mutants replicated with similar kinetics to the parental rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP1D7 and rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP2E1 viruses (Figure 3A), suggesting that the mutations that emerged during replication in the presence of monoclonal antibodies or plasma did not confer a substantial loss of fitness, at least in the context of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP. Moreover, for mutants in RBD sequences that arose in the C121, C135, C144, and COV-NY cultures, each of the viral mutants retained approximately equivalent sensitivity to neutralization by an ACE2-Fc fusion protein, suggesting little or no change in interaction with ACE2 (Figure 3B). Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all Download asset Open asset Characterization of mutant rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP derivatives. (A) Replication of plaque-purified rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP bearing individual S amino-acid substitutions that arose during passage with the indicated antibody or plasma. 293T/ACE2cl.22 cells were inoculated with equivalent doses of parental or mutant rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP isolates. Supernatant was collected at the indicated times after inoculation and number of infectious units present therein was determined on 293T/ACE2cl.22 cells. The mean of two independent experiments is plotted. One set of WT controls run concurrently with the mutants are replotted in the upper and lower left panels, A different set of WT controls run concurrently with the mutants is shown in the lower right panel (B) Infection 293T/ACE2cl.22 cells by rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP encoding the indicated S protein mutations in the presence of increasing amounts of a chimeric ACE2-Fc molecule. Infection was quantified by FACS. Mean of two independent experiments is plotted. The WT controls are replotted in each panel. We next determined the sensitivity of the isolated RBD mutants to neutralization by the three monoclonal antibodies. The E484K and Q493R mutants that emerged during replication in the presence of C121 or C144, both caused apparently complete, or near complete, resistance to both antibodies (IC50 > 10 μg/ml, Figure 4A,B). However, both of these mutants retained full sensitivity (IC50 < 10 ng/ml) to C135. Conversely, the R346S and N440K mutants that emerged during replication in the presence of C135 were resistant to C135, but retained full sensitivity to both C121 and C144 (Figure 4A,B). The K444N, K444T, V445G, V445E, and V445L mutants that arose during replication in the presence of COV-NY plasma conferred partial resistance to C135, with IC50 values ranging from 25 to 700 ng/ml, but these mutants retained full sensitivity to both C121 and C144 (Figure 4A,B). The spatial distribution of these resistance-conferring mutations on the SARS-CoV-2 S RBD surface suggested the existence of both distinct and partly overlapping neutralizing epitopes on the RBD (Figure 4C). The C121 and C144 neutralizing epitopes appear to be similar, and include E484 and Q493, while a clearly distinct conformational epitope seems to be recognized by C135, that includes R346 and N440 residues. Antibodies that constitute at least part of the neutralizing activity evident in COV-NY plasma appear to recognize an epitope that includes and K444 and V445. The ability of mutations at these residues to confer partial resistance to C135 is consistent with their spatial proximity to the C135 conformational epitope (Figure 4C). Figure 4 Download asset Open asset of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP RBD mutants by monoclonal antibodies. (A) of neutralization resistance of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP mutants that were isolated following passage in the presence of antibodies. 293T/ACE2cl.22 cells were inoculated with WT or mutant rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP in the presence of increasing of each monoclonal and infection quantified by hr Mean and from two of two independent (B) of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP mutants isolated following replication in the presence of antibodies. Mean IC50 values were for each antibody combination in two independent (C) of neutralization resistance-conferring of the RBD et al., 2020) with positions that are by mutations were during replication in the presence of each monoclonal antibody or COV-NY plasma To whether neutralization escape mutations conferred loss of to the monoclonal antibodies, we et al., 2020), at their with (Figure The were incubated in with the monoclonal antibodies, were using protein and the of was measured using (Figure As C121, C135, and C144 monoclonal antibodies all the WT (Figure The E484K and Q493R complete, or near complete loss of to C121 and C144 antibodies but retained WT levels of to C135 (Figure Conversely, the R346S and N440K mutants complete loss of to C135, but retained WT levels of to C121 and The and mutants retained near WT levels of to all three antibodies, partial resistance to C135 (Figure the loss of of these mutants for C135 was sufficient to partial neutralization resistance but to in the Figure 5 Download asset Open asset of to monoclonal antibodies by neutralization escape mutants. (A) of the in which is to the of a The fusion protein is incubated with antibodies and using protein (B) quantified following of the indicated WT or mutant fusion proteins with the indicated antibodies and Mean of three replicates at each Analysis of mutants that were isolated from the virus population that emerged during rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP replication in the presence of COV-47 plasma N148S, revealed that these mutants specific resistance to COV-47 plasma. Indeed, the COV-47 plasma NT50 for these mutants was reduced by to (Figure This that the antibody or antibodies responsible for of neutralizing activity in COV-47 plasma target an epitope that includes the potent monoclonal antibody isolated from COV-47 targets the in the epitope in sensitivity to plasmas (Figure that different epitopes are targeted by plasmas from the Figure Download asset Open asset of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP RBD mutants by convalescent plasma. of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP mutants isolated following replication in the presence COV-47 plasma (A) or COV-NY plasma 293T/ACE2cl.22 cells were inoculated with WT or mutant rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP in the presence of increasing amounts of the indicated plasma, and infection quantified by hr Mean of two of two independent experiments (C) Plasma neutralization of rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP mutants isolated following replication in the presence of monoclonal antibodies or convalescent plasma. Mean NT50 values were for each combination from two independent The viral population that emerged during replication in COV-NY plasma yielded mutants or and V445G, or Each of these mutations conferred substantial resistance to neutralization by COV-NY plasma, with ~ 10 to reduction in NT50 (Figure the dominant neutralizing activity in COV-NY plasma is represented by an antibody or antibodies an RBD epitope that includes K444 and V445. As was the case with COV-47 resistant mutants, viruses encoding the mutations conferring resistance to COV-NY plasma retained almost full sensitivity to neutralization by plasmas (Figure the mutations that conferred complete or near complete resistance to the potent RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies C144, C135, and C121 conferred little or no resistance to neutralization by plasma from the same or individuals (Figure These RBD-specific antibodies represent the most potent monoclonal antibodies isolated from COV-47, COV-72, and but the of plasma sensitivity by the monoclonal antibody-resistant mutants suggests that these antibodies little to the neutralization activity of plasma from the same This is consistent with the that cells these antibodies are (Robbiani et al., 2020), and with the results of the selection experiments in which rVSV/SARS-CoV-2/GFP replication in the presence of COV-47, COV-72, and COV-107 plasma did not for mutations that to the neutralization epitopes targeted by the monoclonal antibodies obtained from these individuals (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,B, Figure 2—figure supplement Table 2). analysis of this set of monoclonal antibodies and plasmas that potent neutralization can be conferred by antibodies that target SARS-CoV-2 epitopes. Moreover, the most potently neutralizing antibodies generated in a given COVID19 convalescent individual may in only a way to the neutralizing antibody response in that same individual (see occurrence of RBD mutations The aforementioned neutralizing antibody escape mutations were generated during in replication of a recombinant virus. However, as monoclonal antibodies are for therapeutic and prophylactic

As the COVID-19 pandemic has progressed, new variants of the virus SARS-CoV-2 have emerged that are more infectious than the original form. The variants known as Alpha, Beta and Gamma have mutations in a protein on the virus’s surface that is vital for attaching to cells and infecting them. This protein, called Spike, carries out its role by binding to ACE2, a protein on the surface of human cells. Mutations on Spike are found on the region where it binds to ACE2. The interaction between these two proteins appears to be important to the behaviour of SARS-CoV-2, but the impact of individual mutations in Spike is unknown. In addition, some people have different variants of ACE2 with mutations in the region that interacts with Spike, but it is not known whether this affects these people’s risk of contracting COVID-19. To answer these questions, Barton et al. measured the precise effect of mutations in Spike and ACE2 on the strength of the interaction between the two proteins. The experiments showed that three of the five common Spike mutations in the Alpha, Beta and Gamma SARS-CoV-2 variants strengthened binding to ACE2. The two mutations that weakened binding were only found together with other mutations that strengthened binding. This meant that the Spike proteins in all three of these SARS-CoV-2 variants bind to ACE2 more strongly than the original form. The experiments also showed that two common variants of ACE2 also increased the strength of binding to Spike. Interestingly, one of these ACE2 variants reversed the effect of a specific SARS-CoV-2 mutation, suggesting that carriers would be resistant to SARS-CoV-2 variants with this mutation. Identifying the precise effects of Spike mutations on ACE2 binding helps understand why new variants of SARS-CoV-2 spread more rapidly. This could help to identify concerning new variants before they spread widely and inform the response by health authorities. The finding that two common ACE2 variants bind more strongly to Spike suggests that people with these mutations could be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2.

The interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 virus Spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) and the ACE2 cell surface protein is required for viral infection of cells. Mutations in the RBD are present in SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern that have emerged independently worldwide. For example, the B.1.1.7 lineage has a mutation (N501Y) in its Spike RBD that enhances binding to ACE2. There are also ACE2 alleles in humans with mutations in the RBD binding site. Here we perform a detailed affinity and kinetics analysis of the effect of five common RBD mutations (K417N, K417T, N501Y, E484K, and S477N) and two common ACE2 mutations (S19P and K26R) on the RBD/ACE2 interaction. We analysed the effects of individual RBD mutations and combinations found in new SARS-CoV-2 Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), and Gamma (P1) variants. Most of these mutations increased the affinity of the RBD/ACE2 interaction. The exceptions were mutations K417N/T, which decreased the affinity. Taken together with other studies, our results suggest that the N501Y and S477N mutations enhance transmission primarily by enhancing binding, the K417N/T mutations facilitate immune escape, and the E484K mutation enhances binding and immune escape.

Antibodies induced by receptor-binding domain in spike protein of SARS-CoV do not cross-neutralize the novel human coronavirus hCoV-EMC

Tackling COVID19 by Exploiting Pre-existing Cross-Reacting Spike-Specific Immunity

The emergence and rapid proliferation of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) resulted in a global pandemic, with over six million cases and nearly four hundred thousand deaths reported worldwide by the end of May 2020. A rush to find the cure prompted re-evaluation of a range of existing therapeutics vis-à-vis their potential role in treating COVID-19, placing a premium on analytical tools capable of supporting such efforts. Native mass spectrometry (MS) has long been a tool of choice in supporting the mechanistic studies of drug/therapeutic target interactions, but its applications remain limited in the cases that involve systems with a high level of structural heterogeneity. Both SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S-protein), a critical element of the viral entry to the host cell, and ACE2, its docking site on the host cell surface, are extensively glycosylated, making them challenging targets for native MS. However, supplementing native MS with a gas-phase ion manipulation technique (limited charge reduction) allows meaningful information to be obtained on the non-covalent complexes formed by ACE2 and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the S-protein. Using this technique in combination with molecular modeling also allows the role of heparin in destabilizing the ACE2/RBD association to be studied, providing critical information for understanding the molecular mechanism of its interference with the virus docking to the host cell receptor. Both short (pentasaccharide) and relatively long (eicosasaccharide) heparin oligomers form 1:1 complexes with RBD, indicating the presence of a single binding site. This association alters the protein conformation (to maximize the contiguous patch of the positive charge on the RBD surface), resulting in a notable decrease of its ability to associate with ACE2. The destabilizing effect of heparin is more pronounced in the case of the longer chains due to the electrostatic repulsion between the low-pI ACE2 and the heparin segments not accommodated on the RBD surface. In addition to providing important mechanistic information on attenuation of the ACE2/RBD association by heparin, the study demonstrates the yet untapped potential of native MS coupled to gas-phase ion chemistry as a means of facilitating rational repurposing of the existing medicines for treating COVID-19.

Antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) are being developed as therapeutics and make a major contribution to the neutralizing antibody response elicited by infection. Here, we describe a deep mutational scanning method to map how all amino-acid mutations in the RBD affect antibody binding, and apply this method to 10 human monoclonal antibodies. The escape mutations cluster on several surfaces of the RBD that broadly correspond to structurally defined antibody epitopes. However, even antibodies targeting the same RBD surface often have distinct escape mutations. The complete escape maps predict which mutations are selected during viral growth in the presence of single antibodies, and enable us to design escape-resistant antibody cocktails–including cocktails of antibodies that compete for binding to the same surface of the RBD but have different escape mutations. Therefore, complete escape-mutation maps enable rational design of antibody therapeutics and assessment of the antigenic consequences of viral evolution.

SummaryAntibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) are being developed as therapeutics and are a major contributor to neutralizing antibody responses elicited by infection. Here, we describe a deep mutational scanning method to map how all amino-acid mutations in the RBD affect antibody binding and apply this method to 10 human monoclonal antibodies. The escape mutations cluster on several surfaces of the RBD that broadly correspond to structurally defined antibody epitopes. However, even antibodies targeting the same surface often have distinct escape mutations. The complete escape maps predict which mutations are selected during viral growth in the presence of single antibodies. They further enable the design of escape-resistant antibody cocktails—including cocktails of antibodies that compete for binding to the same RBD surface but have different escape mutations. Therefore, complete escape-mutation maps enable rational design of antibody therapeutics and assessment of the antigenic consequences of viral evolution.

Recent studies have revealed the unique virological characteristics of Omicron, particularly those of its spike protein, such as less cleavage efficacy in cells, reduced ACE2 binding affinity, and poor fusogenicity. However, it remains unclear which mutation(s) determine these three virological characteristics of Omicron spike. Here, we show that these characteristics of the Omicron spike protein are determined by its receptor-binding domain. Of interest, molecular phylogenetic analysis revealed that acquisition of the spike S375F mutation was closely associated with the explosive spread of Omicron in the human population. We further elucidated that the F375 residue forms an interprotomer pi-pi interaction with the H505 residue of another protomer in the spike trimer, conferring the attenuated cleavage efficiency and fusogenicity of Omicron spike. Our data shed light on the evolutionary events underlying the emergence of Omicron at the molecular level.

SARS-CoV-2 infection and ACE2 inhibition.

Emergence of vaccine escape variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a grave global concern. The interface between the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein and the host receptor (ACE2) overlaps the binding site of principal neutralizing antibodies (NAb), limiting the repertoire of viable mutations. Epistasis among RBD mutations can increase the risk of vaccine escape. We compare the effects of all single mutants at the RBD-NAb and RBD-ACE2 interfaces for wild type (WT), Gamma and Delta variants using Rosetta. Epistasis at the RBD surface appears to be limited and the effects of most multiple mutations are additive. For Delta variant, epistasis weakly stabilizes NAb interaction relative to ACE2, whereas in Gamma, epistasis more substantially destabilizes NAb interaction. Thus, the repertoire of potential escape mutations for Delta is not substantially different from that of WT, whereas Gamma poses a moderately greater risk of vaccine escape.Funding: Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health of the USA (National Library of Medicine), to E. V. KooninDeclaration of Interests: The declare they have no competing interests.

Since its first detection in 2019, the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) has been the cause of millions of deaths worldwide. Despite the development and administration of different vaccines, the situation is still worrisome as the virus is constantly mutating to produce newer variants some of which are highly infectious. This raises an urgent requirement to understand the infection mechanism and thereby design therapeutic‐based treatment for COVID‐19. The gateway of the virus to the host cell is mediated by the binding of the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the virus spike protein to the angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) of the human cell. Therefore, the RBD of SARS‐CoV‐2 can be used as a target to design therapeutics. The α1 helix of ACE2, which forms direct contact with the RBD surface, has been used as a template in the current study to design stapled peptide therapeutics. Using computer simulation, the mechanism and thermodynamics of the binding of six stapled peptides with RBD have been estimated. Among these, the one with two lactam stapling agents has shown binding affinity, sufficient to overcome RBD‐ACE2 binding. Analyses of the mechanistic detail reveal that a reorganization of amino acids at the RBD‐ACE2 interface produces favorable enthalpy of binding whereas conformational restriction of the free peptide reduces the loss in entropy to result higher binding affinity. The understanding of the relation of the nature of the stapling agent with their binding affinity opens up the avenue to explore stapled peptides as therapeutic against SARS‐CoV‐2.