Identifying cues for tone-in-noise detection using decision variable correlation in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Abstract

Previous studies evaluated cues for masked tone detection using reproducible noise waveforms. Human results founded on this approach suggest that tone detection is based on combined energy and envelope (ENV) cues, but detection cues in nonhuman species are less clear. Decision variable correlation (DVC) was used to evaluate tone-in-noise detection cues in the budgerigar, an avian species with human-like behavioral sensitivity to many complex sounds. DVC quantifies a model's ability to predict trial-by-trial variance in behavioral responses. Budgerigars were behaviorally conditioned to detect 500-Hz tones in wideband (WB; 100-3000 Hz) and narrowband (NB; 452-552 Hz) noise. Behavioral responses were obtained using a single-interval, two-alternative discrimination task and two-down, one-up adaptive tracking procedures. Tone-detection thresholds in WB noise were higher than human thresholds, putatively due to broader peripheral frequency tuning, whereas NB thresholds were within ∼1 dB of human results. Budgerigar average hit and false-alarm rates across noise waveforms were consistent, highly correlated across subjects, and correlated to human results. Trial-by-trial behavioral results in NB noise were best explained by a model combining energy and ENV cues. In contrast, WB results were better predicted by ENV-based or multiple-channel energy detector models. These results suggest that budgerigars and humans use similar cues for tone-in-noise detection.