Abstract

To date, readers of financial statements are not able to identify speculation as risk-increasing activity from public corporate disclosures. We examine a unique regulatory environment, in which the regulating authority recommends additional FX-disclosures in excess of prevailing reporting standards and find that these optional publications enable, henceforth, the identification of speculative activities. Further, we help solve the puzzle of the determinants of speculation and find that frequent speculators are smaller, have more growth opportunities and possess lower internal resources, which indicates unprecedented empirical evidence for the convexity theories of Campbell & Kracaw (1999) and Adam, Dasgupta, & Titman (2007). Our findings substantiate the significance of an extended reporting with optional disclosures that might unlock numerous benefits for both share- and stakeholders.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.