Identifying Cellular and Viral Factor Recruitment to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Replication Forks

Abstract

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV‐1) is a ubiquitous pathogen that replicates the 152kbp viral genome within the nucleus of host cells. Replication of the HSV‐1 genome is catalyzed by viral replication machinery consisting of a DNA polymerase (UL30), processivity factor (UL42), helicase‐primase complex, origin binding protein (UL9), and a single stranded DNA binding protein. Despite encoding a viral DNA polymerase processivity factor, we found that host Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) interacts with HSV‐1 DNA at replication forks and associates with viral DNA in a replication‐dependent manner. PCNA is a homotrimer that provides processivity to cellular DNA polymerases and selectively recruits DNA damage response and DNA repair factors to cellular replication forks. We therefore hypothesized that PCNA associates at viral replication forks to promote HSV‐1 replication while also tethering cellular DNA repair proteins to replicating viral DNA. To test this, we used two models to identify how associated factors change as a function of PCNA: a known PCNA inhibitor, PCNA‐I1, and a cell line that was engineered to inducibly express a shRNA targeting PCNA. We performed a technique adapted from isolation of proteins on nascent DNA (iPOND) to isolate HSV‐1 DNA from infected cells and identified associated viral and cellular proteins. Cells were infected and replicating viral DNA was selectively labeled with EdC. Labeled DNA was specifically and irreversibly tagged via the covalent attachment of biotin azide via click reaction. Biotin‐tagged DNA was purified on streptavidin‐coated beads and associated proteins were eluted and identified by mass spectrometry. As a complimentary approach, we also performed immunofluorescence (IF) to confirm iPOND data. We found that PCNA is associated with viral DNA despite treatment with PCNA‐I1, an observation that is consistent with IF imaging data. Viral replication proteins UL30, UL42, and UL9 decreased in the presence of PCNA‐I1. DNA damage response proteins such as mismatch repair proteins and RECQL both decreased up to 10‐fold. Of note, however, proteins that make up the MRN complex, a class of proteins that functions in DNA break repair, restart of stalled replication forks, and viral DNA infection, increased in response to PCNA‐I1 treatment. Given this data, PCNA may be involved in tethering viral replication proteins, cellular DNA repair proteins, and/or virion assembly proteins to viral replication forks.