Abstract

Abstract. A widely overlooked source of carbon (C) in the soil environment is organic carbon (OC) of geogenic origin, e.g. graphite, occurring mostly in metamorphic rocks. Appropriate methods are not available to quantify graphite and to differentiate it from other organic and inorganic C sources in soils. This methodological shortcoming also complicates studies on OC in soils formed on graphite-containing bedrock because of the unknown contribution of a very different soil OC source. In this study, we examined Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and the smart combustion method for their ability to identify and quantify graphitic C in soils. For this purpose, several artificial soil samples with graphite, CaCO3 and plant litter as the usual C components were created. A graphitic standard was mixed with pure quartz and a natural soil for calibration and validation of the methods over a graphitic C range of 0.1 % to 4 %. Furthermore, rock and soil material from a graphite-bearing schist and a schist without natural graphite were used for method validation. FTIR. As specific signal intensities of distinct graphite absorption bands were missing, calibration could only be performed on general effects of graphite contents on the energy transmitted through the samples. The use of samples from different mineral origins yielded significant matrix effects and hampered the prediction of geogenic graphite contents in soils. TGA. Thermogravimetric analysis, based on changes in mass loss due to differences in thermal stabilities, is suggested as a useful method for graphite identification, although (calcium) carbonate and graphitic C have a similar thermal stability. However, the quantitative estimation of the graphite contents was challenging as dehydroxylation (mass loss) of a wide range of soil minerals occurs in a similar temperature range. Smart combustion. The method is based on measuring the release of C during a combustion program, quantified by a non-dispersive infrared detector (NDIR) as part of a commercial elemental analyser, whereby carbonates and graphitic C could be separated by switching between oxic and anoxic conditions during thermal decomposition. Samples were heated to 400 ∘C under oxygen-rich conditions, after which further heating was done under anoxic conditions till 900 ∘C. The residual oxidizable carbon (ROC), hypothesized to be graphitic C, was measured by switching back to oxygenic conditions at 900 ∘C. Test samples showed promising results for quantifying graphitic C in soils. For the purpose of quantifying graphitic C content in soil samples, smart combustion was the most promising method of those which have been examined in this study. However, caution should be taken with carbonate-rich soils as increasing amounts of carbonate resulted in an underestimation of graphitic C content.

Highlights

  • In the past decades, global carbon (C) cycling has gained more and more attention

  • This study focuses on the residual oxidizable C (ROC) component, this point might be important when considering the total organic carbon 400 ◦C” (TOC400) and total inorganic C (TIC) fractions of the smart combustion method

  • The thermal boundaries for the different C fractions given in the DIN19539 (GS) standard are debatable (Ussiri et al, 2014; Schiedung et al, 2017), we showed that the ROC fraction corresponded closely to the graphitic C content

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global carbon (C) cycling has gained more and more attention. As an important component in this cycle, the soil C reservoir consists of many different forms and types of carbonaceous substances, each with unique turnover times and functions. The most widely studied and dynamic soil C component is fresh organic matter (OM), derived from litter input, decaying organisms and plant exudates (summarized in Blankinship et al, 2018) Another well-studied soil C component is inorganic C in the form of carbonates, which forms an important part of the soil C pool, especially under arid climate conditions (Zamanian et al, 2016; Apesteguia et al, 2018). Intruding hydrothermal fluids in the earth’s crust forms a second source of graphitic C during rock formation, which produces the purest graphite crystals (Rumble, 2014) This relatively pure and stable form of C is highly chemical inert, impurities from the parent material increase its chemical reactivity (Beyssac and Rumble, 2014). Graphitic C occurs mainly in rocks from orogenic belts and in metasedimentary rocks in old cratons and might be a quite common bedrock for soil development (Hartmann and Moosdorf, 2012; Buseck and Beysacc, 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call