Abstract

In 1991, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) was passed in the US congress. The Act delineated a set of public objectives as a rationale for continued government funding and intervention in transit. This paper examines the extent to which urban transit agencies complied with the ISTEA requirements of both technical and social efficiency. To do this, we propose a method of measuring both technical and social efficiency using data envelopment analysis (DEA). We find that in general, urban transit agencies did not pursue the social objectives specified by ISTEA.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call