Abstract

The heterogeneity among multiple ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions within the same patient also diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) has not been well evaluated, leaving research implications of intra-individual DCIS heterogeneity yet to be explored. In this study formalin-fixed paraffin embedded sections from 36 patients concurrently diagnosed with DCIS and IDC were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Ten DCIS lesions from each patient were then randomly selected and scored. Our results showed that expression of PR, HER2, Ki-67, and p16 varied significantly within DCIS lesions from a single patient (P<0.05 for PR; P<1×10−8 for HER2, Ki-67 and p16). In addition, seventy-two percent of the individuals had heterogeneous expression of at least 2/6 markers. Importantly, by evaluating the expression of promising DCIS risk biomarkers (Ki-67, p53 and p16) among different DCIS subgroups classified by comparing DCIS molecular subtypes with those of adjacent normal terminal duct lobular units (TDLU) and IDC, our results suggest the existence of a highly-aggressive DCIS subgroup, which had the same molecular subtype as the adjacent IDC but not the same subtype as the adjacent normal TDLU. By using a systematic approach, our results clearly demonstrate that intra-individual heterogeneity in DCIS is very common in patients concurrently diagnosed with IDC. Our novel findings of a DCIS subpopulation with aggressive characteristics will provide a new paradigm for mechanistic studies of breast tumor progression and also have broad implications for prevention research as heterogeneous pre-invasive lesions are present in many other cancer types.

Highlights

  • In 2014, it is estimated that about 62,570 new cases of breast carcinoma in situ will be diagnosed in the US, with the majority being classified as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which represents about one-fifth of the number of mammographically detected breast cancers in the US [1,2]

  • We found that HER2+ and basal-like subtype DCIS lesions have higher Ki-67 and p53 scores than DCIS lesions with the luminal A subtype (Table 3)

  • DCIS lesions with different molecular subtypes were categorized into distinct groups by comparing their subtypes with those of adjacent normal terminal duct lobular units (TDLU) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (Figure 2C)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2014, it is estimated that about 62,570 new cases of breast carcinoma in situ will be diagnosed in the US, with the majority being classified as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which represents about one-fifth of the number of mammographically detected breast cancers in the US [1,2]. Since there is no accurate risk assessment currently available to determine which patients with DCIS are at the greatest risk of developing invasive carcinoma in their lifetime, DCIS poses a primary challenge for physicians to make the best and safest treatment decision for patients with DCIS; whether they need surgery, radiation, and/or adjuvant hormone therapy. Uncertainties about the clinical behavior of DCIS often lead to unnecessarily aggressive treatment for DCIS patients with lesions that are unlikely to progress to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). This results in net harm to these breast cancer patients

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call